SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(MP) 388

SUJOY PAUL, ANIL VERMA
Sanjay Jain – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Ms. Deepika Rathi for appellant, Shrey Raj Saxena,
Dy.Advocate General for respondents/State.

ORDER

Paul, J. -- 1. This intra-Court appeal assails the order dated 10.2.2021 passed in WP No.2250/2021 whereby writ petition filed by appellant was dismissed by holding that as per Clause-22 of the Contract, his services are deemed to have been terminated because he remained absent for a period of one month.

2. The appellant was appointed as Sub-Engineer by order dated 11.10.2006. The appellant was transferred by order dated 28.7.2016 from Janpad Panchayat Nalchha to Janpad Panchayat Tirala. The case of petitioner is that despite his entitlement and directions of higher authorities, the salary of appellant was stopped on the ground that his name is not reflected in the relevant departmental portal. The appellant being aggrieved with this served a legal notice, approached the authorities from pillar to post including the Human Rights Commission, but when such efforts could not fetch any result, filed WP. No. 2250/2021.

3. The appellant called in question the legality, validity and propriety of the order dated 3.9.2019 (Annexure P/1) whereby in reply to the legal notice sent by the appellant, the Department informed him that since appellant has tendered resignation, the question of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top