SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(MP) 877

ANAND PATHAK, PUSHPENDRA YADAV
Anand Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Rekha Sharma – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Vivek Kumar Vyas for appellant; Santosh Kumar Sharma for respondent.

JUDGMENT

Pathak, J:-- 1. The present appeal under section 19 of the Family Courts Act 1984 is preferred by the appellant/husband being crestfallen by the judgment dated 16.2.2023 passed by Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Gwalior in RCSHM No.20371/2018 whereby the divorce petition preferred by the appellant under section 13(1)(i-d)(i-[k) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act of 1955”) has been dismissed.

2. Precisely stated facts of the case are that marriage of appellant and respondent was solemnized on 24.6.2011 at Gwalior through Hindu rites and rituals. According to appellant, soon after marriage, behaviour of respondent/wife was changed and she started fighting over the small issues. Respondent/wife deprived the appellant from the marital obligations. After marriage, couple started residing at Virar in joint family but behaviour of respondent turned irritating and she used to argue with the parents of appellant. Respondent/wife also started pressurizing the appellant to live in Gwalior as she was not interested in living at Virar and she also pressurized the appellant and his family members to give her share in the property otherwise she w

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top