SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(MP) 923

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Ashish Shroti, J.
Gulab Singh Jatav (Dr.) v. The State of Madhya Pradesh & Others
Writ Petition No. 23740 of 2022 (Gwalior); Decided on 10.12.2025

Advocates appeared:
D.P. Singh for petitioner; Sohit Mishra, Government Advocate for respondents/State.

Headnote:

Educational Service (Collegiate Branch) Recruitment Rules, 1990 (M.P.) -- R. 8 Sch. III -- M.P. Civil Services (General Conditions of Services) Rules, 1961 -- Rr. 8 and 12 -- petitioner was appointed on probation for two years -- during this period, he was required to obtain qualification of NET/SLET/PhD -- Higher Education Department extended said period up to 2017 -- vide impugned order, he has been confirmed in service w.e.f. 28.4.2017, i.e., after he acquired PhD qualification -- grievance of petitioner is that he ought to have been confirmed in service on completion of two years, i.e., on 14.6.2006 -- he claims that acquisition of PhD qualification was not condition precedent for his confirmation in service -- held -- as per Sch. III referable to R. 8, possessing NET or SLET or PhD degree is one of the essential qualifications for appointment -- in normal circumstances, petitioner was required to hold aforesaid qualification while submitting candidature for appointment -- however, it being a special drive to fill up backlog post, condition was relaxed and candidates were permitted to acquire qualification within two years of appointment -- advertisement also specifically provided that candidate is required to acquire qualification within two years of appointment -- the very appointment of petitioner was a conditional one based upon his acquiring qualification of NET/SLET/PhD -- his appointment itself was liable to be cancelled/terminated on failure to acquire qualification in time -- he could save his appointment as Government extended time to acquire qualification -- however, that would not entitle petitioner for confirmation in service without acquiring qualification -- since petitioner would be entitled to draw regular increments on confirmation in service, he cannot claim confirmation without acquiring qualification -- confirming service of petitioner a day after his acquiring qualification is legal and valid -- respondent No. 3 directed to verify and take necessary steps if other similarly situated persons have been confirmed in service after two years of their appointment without their acquiring aforesaid qualification. (1996)11 SCC 173 followed. 2016 (1) MPLJ 449 (FB) relied on. [Paras 4 to 6, 10, 11, 15, 17 & 19]

'kS{kf.kd lsok ¼egkfo|ky;hu 'kk[kk½ HkrhZ fu;e] 1990 ¼e-ç½ & fu- 8 vuqlwph 3 & e-ç- flfoy lsok ¼lsok dh lk/kkj.k 'krsZ½ fu;e] 1961 & fu- 8 rFkk 12 & ;kph dks nks o"kZ dh ifjoh{kk ij fu;qä fd;k x;k & bl vof/k ds nkSjku mlds }kjk usV@LysV@ih,pMh dh vgZrk vfHkçkIr dh tkuk visf{kr Fkh & mPp f'k{kk foHkkx us mä vof/k 2017 rd cढ+k nh & vkf{kIr vkns'k }kjk 28-4-2017 ls vFkkZr~ mlds }kjk ih,pMh vgZrk vftZr fd, tkus ds i'pkr~ lsok esa mldh iqf"V dh xbZ & ;kph dh f'kdk;r gS fd lsok esa mldh iqf"V nks o"kZ iw.kZ gksus ij vFkkZr~ 14-6-2006 dks dh tkuk pkfg, Fkh & mldk nkok gS fd lsok esa mldh iqf"V fd, tkus ds fy, ih,pMh dh vgZrk vftZr djuk iwoZ'krZ ugha Fkh & vfHkfu/kkZfjr & fu- 8 dks lanHkZuh; vuqlwph 3 ds vuqlkj] usV ;k LysV ;k ih,pMh fMxzh gksuk fu;qfä ds fy, vfuok;Z 'krksZ esa ls ,d gS & lkekU; ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa] fu;qfä ds fy, vH;fFkZrk is'k djrs le; ;kph }kjk iwoksZä vgZrk /kkj.k dh tkuk vko';d Fkk & rFkkfi] lafp=u Hkjk x;k in Hkjus ds fy, fo'ks"k vfHk;ku gksus ds dkj.k 'krZ f'kfFky dh xbZ rFkk vH;fFkZ;ksa dks fu;qfä ds nks o"kZ ds Hkhrj vgZrk vftZr djus dh vuqefr nh xbZ & foKkiu esa Hkh fofufnZ"Vr% micafèkr Fkk fd vH;FkhZ }kjk fu;qfä ds nks o"kZ ds Hkhrj vgZrk vftZr dh tkuk visf{kr gS & ;kph dh fu;qfä gh mlds }kjk usV@LysV@ih,pMh dh vgZrk vftZr fd, tkus ij vk/kkfjr] l'krZ fu;qfä Fkh & le; ls vgZrk çkIr djus esa vlQy jgus ij mldh fu;qfä gh jn~n lekIr fd, tkus ;ksX; Fkh & og viuh fu;qfä blfy, cpk ldk D;ksafd ljdkj us vgZrk vftZr djus dk le; cढ+k fn;k Fkk & rFkkfi] blls ;kph vgZrk vftZr fd, fcuk lsok esa iqf"V dk gdnkj ugha gks tk,xk & lsok esa iqf"V gksus ij ;kph fu;fer osruo`f);k¡ çkIr djus dk gdnkj gks tk,xk blfy, vgZrk vftZr fd, fcuk og iqf"V dk nkok ugha dj ldrk & vgZrk vftZr djus ds ,d fnu i'pkr~ ;kph dh lsok dh iqf"V djuk oS/k vkSj fof/kekU; gS & çR;FkhZ Øekad 3 dks ;g tk¡p djus fd D;k vU; lekur% fLFkr O;fä;ksa }kjk mudh fu;qfä ds nks o"kZ ds Hkhrj iwoksZä vgZrk vftZr fd, x, fcuk lsok esa mudh iqf"V dh xbZ gS vkSj vko';d dne mBkus dk funs'k fn;k x;kA ¼1996½ 11 ,llhlh 173 vuqlfjrA 2016 ¼1½ ,eih,yts 449 ¼iw.kZ U;k;ihB½ voyafcrA ¼iSjk 4 ls 6] 10] 11] 15] 17 ,oa 19½

ORDER

1. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 28.1.2019 (Annexure P/1), whereby his probation is declared complete and he is confirmed in service w.e.f. 29.4.2007, instead of 2 years after his appointment, i.e. 9.7.2006 as the period of probation was only for two years. He has prayed for a direction to the respondents to correct the date of confirmation of his service and to extend him consequential benefits.

2. The petitioner initially held the qualification of M.A. (English). As per the averments made in writ petition, in a special drive initiated by the Higher Education Department of Government of Madhya Pradesh for filling up the backlog posts of Assistant Professors, the applications were invited vide advertisement dated 10.07.2003 (Annexure P/2). Clause - 7 of the advertisement provided that the candidates are required to ensure that they possess necessary educational qualification. A corrigendum to the advertisement was thereafter issued on 02.10.2003 (Annexure P/3) prescribing the necessary educational qualification for appointment on the post. The qualification prescribed is as under:-

^^vfuok;Z 'kS{kf.kd vgZrk%&

¼d½ fo'ofo|ky; vuqnku vk;ksx }kjk le;≤ ij fofgr 'kS{kf.kd vgZrk] LukrdksÙkj Lrj ij de ls de 55 Áfr'kr vad gksus pkfg;s] ijUrq vuqlwfpr tkfr;ksa rFkk vuqlwfpr tutkfr;ksa ds vH;fFkZ;ksa ds fy;s vadksa dk Áfr'kr 50 Áfr'kr gksxkA

¼[k½ us'kuy ,fythfcfyVh VsLV ¼,u-bZ-Vh-½ ;k e/; Áns'k jkT; Lrjh; ik=rk ijh{kk ¼,l-,y-bZ-Vh½ ;k ih-,p-Mh- mikf/k /kkjd] tks vkosnd usV@LysV@ih-,p-Mh- dh ikf/kd /kkj.k ugha djrs gSa] mudk p;u bl 'krZ ds v/khu jgsxk fd ;s usV@LysV@ih-,p-Mh- dh mikf/k nks o"kZ dh vof/k esa ÁkIr dj ysaxsA ;fn bl vofèk esa mDr ;ksXr;k ÁkIr ugha djrs gSa rks mudh lsok,¡ lekIr dh tk,axhA ;s fo'ks"k NwV lkekU; Á'kklu foHkkx }kjk dsoy ,d ckj ds fy, Ánku dh xbZ gSA

3- vkosnu i= ÁkIr djus dh vafre frfFk vc 14-10-2003 fu/kkZfjr dh tkrh gSA mijksDr foKkiu ds lanHkZ esa ftu vH;fFkZ;ksa us iwoZ esa vkosnu dj fn;k gS] mUgsa iqu% vkosnu djus dh vko';drk ugha gSA

4- foKkiu dh vU; 'krsZ ;Fkkor jgsaxhA**

3. The petitioner successfully participated in the recruitment process and was appointed on the post of Assistant Professor vide order, dated 14.6.2004 (Annexure P/7). He was given posting at Government Degree College, Karera, District Shivpuri. The petitioner submitted his joining on 12.7.2004. Subsequently, the order of appointment was amended vide order dated 27.12.2004 by incorporating following additional conditions:-

^^¼1½ yksd lsok vk;ksx }kjk tkjh foKkiu ds vuqlkj mEehnokj dks nks o"kZ ds Hkhrj usV ;k LVsy ;k ih-,p-Mh- dh vgZrk vftZr djuk vko';d gSA

¼2½ lkekU; Á'kklu foHkkx ds ifji= Øekad&9&8@2003@vk-Á-@,d] fnukad 13 tuojh] 2003 esa fufgr Áko/kku ds Ádk'k esa mDr mEehnokjksa ds fu;qfDr vkns'k pfj= lR;kiu ,oa LFkkbZ tkfr Áek.k i= ÁkIr gksus dh ÁR;k'kk esa tkjh fd;s x;s FksA pfj= lR;kiu dh fjiksVZ esa 'kkldh; lsok ds v;ksX; ik;s tkus] 6 ekg ds Hkhrj LFkkbZ tkfr Áek.k i= 'kklu dks ÁLrqr ugha djus rFkk mijksDr dafMdk&1 esa of.kZr ;ksX;rk nks o"kZ dh fu/kkZfjr vof/k esa vftZr ugha djus dh fLFkfr esa lacaf/kr mEehnokj dh lsok;sa rRdky ÁHkko ls fcuk lwpuk fn, lekIr dh tkosaxhA**

4. It is thus clear that the petitioner's appointment on the post of Assistant Professor was on probation for a period of two years and during this period of two years, he was required to obtain qualification of NET/SLET/Ph.D. The Higher Education Department vide order dated 9.6.2006 extended the time to acquire qualification by two years. Again, by order dated 27.9.2017, (Annexure P/12), the said period was extended up to year 2017.

5. The petitioner was awarded Ph.D. vide notification dated 24.7.2017 (Annexure P/13). Accordingly vide order dated 28.1.2019 (Annexure P/1), he is confirmed in service w.e.f. 28.4.2017 i.e. a day after he acquired Ph.D. qualification.

6. The grievance of the petitioner is that his appointment was on probation for a period of two years and, therefore, he ought to have been confirmed in service on comp

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top