SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Raj) 2541

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, ACJ, BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU, J.
Jai Singh S/o Ram Singh – Appellant
Versus
Rajasthan High Court, Jodhpur through its Registrar General – Respondent
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14072 of 2025
Decided On : 31-10-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Tribhuvan Narayan Singh
For the Respondents: Shailesh Prakash Sharma, Avi Sharma

Eligibility for promotion under the Rajasthan High Court Staff Service Rules is based on grade rather than specific post, but mere financial upgradation does not confer entitlement to promotion.

Headnote:(A) Rajasthan High Court Staff Service Rules, 2002 - Clause 4-A - Writ petition for recruitment by promotion to the post of Assistant Stamp Reporter - Petitioners, initially Library Restorers, claimed eligibility based on higher pay levels post-ACP - Non-inclusion of names in eligible candidates list found arbitrary; eligibility determined by grade, not rigidly by cadre - Court ruled non-consideration as illegal but petitioners deemed ineligible due to lack of actual promotion. (Paras 4, 14, 24, 35)

(B) Promotion Criteria - Clear language of statute dictates eligibility around grade rather than specific post qualifications - Courts must interpret statutory provisions based on the explicit wording rather than interpolating intentions. (Paras 20, 29)

(C) Promotion and Probation - Employee on probation cannot be considered for promotion prior to confirmation - Mere financial upgradation (ACP) does not equate to functional promotion. (Paras 20, 32)

Findings of Court:
The non-consideration of the candidature of the petitioners was not sustainable, yet the petitioners were held not eligible for promotion due to procedural requirements and lack of functional promotion.

Issues: (1) Eligibility determination based on grade versus specific post; (2) Entitlement of employees on ACP for promotion; (3) Impact of probationary status on promotion eligibility.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized strict adherence to the language of rules defining eligibility based on grade and affirmed that only employees holding actual posts could be promoted, not those with mere financial upgradation.

Result: Writ petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. petitioners' grievance over eligibility for promotions. (Para 1 , 4 , 6)
2. details of past appointments and promotions. (Para 2 , 5)
3. overview of recruitment rules and cadre structure. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
4. eligibility criteria under rule 4-a for promotions. (Para 12 , 13)
5. interpretation of eligibility qualifications based on grade. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18)
6. assessment of petitioners' qualifications regarding promotions. (Para 24 , 25 , 26)
7. probationary status implications for promotions. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32)
8. final dismissal of petition based on eligibility findings. (Para 34 , 35 , 36)

JUDGMENT :

BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU, J.

1. Petitioners have preferred the present writ petition with following prayers:-

“It is therefore most humbly and respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to accept and allow this writ petition and further it is humbly prayed that:

(i) by an appropriate writ, order or direction the action of the respondents of not considering the petitioners as eligible for the recruitment by promotion through qualifying test for the vacant posts of Assistant Stamp Reporter and Court Fee Examiners in pursuance of advertisement dated: 27-08-2025 (Annexure: 03) be declared arbitrary, discriminatory, illegal, wrong and void.

(ii) by an appropriate writ, order or direction the respondents be directed to consider the petitioners as eligible employees of Rajasthan High Court and allow the petitioners to participate and submit in prescribed form in the recruitment by promotion through qualifying test for the vacant posts of Assistant Stamp Reporter and Court Fee Examiners in pursuance of advertisement dated: 27-08-2025 (Annexure: 03) in accordance with Rule (4-A) Assistant Stamp Reporter and Court Fee Examiners of the Rajasthan High Court Staff Ser-vice Rules, 2002 (Annexure: 04)

(iii) by an appropriate writ, order or direction the respondents be directed that in case the petitioners are found eligible as per their qualifying test or any other eligibility as required then the petitioners be granted promotion on the post of Assistant Stamp Reporter and Court Fee Examiners with all consequential benefits flowing thereof.

(iv) any other relief which the Hon’ble Court deems fit be passed in favour of the petitioners.

Hence, the petitioner aggrieved of the same, prefers the present Writ Petition. Hence, this Writ Petition.”

2. Petitioners herein were initially appointed to the post of Library Restorer. Thereafter, they were further granted benefit of 1st Assured Career Progression (ACP) on completion of nine years of continuous service vide order dated 06.07.2022, and petitioner no. 4, thereafter has been promoted to the post of cataloguer-cum-classifier vide order dated 04.06.2025.

3. Reproduced below is the table showing the status of the petitioners as set out in Para 2 of the petition:-

4. The petitioners have approached this Court stating that the respondents issued Advertisement dated 27.08.2025 under the Rajasthan High Court Staff Service Rules, 2002 (for short “the Rules of 2002”) inviting applications for recruitment by way of promotion through qualifying test for the post of Assistant Stamp Reporter and Court Fee Examiners (L-11 in Pay Level-37800-119700 & Grade Pay 4200/-) on the criteria of Seniority cum Merit. The Advertisement included the list of eligible candidates, however the names of the petitioners were not included. It is stated that clause (4-A) of the order dated 05.12.2002 issued under the Rules of 2002, provides for the recruitment to the post of Assistant Stamp Reporter and Court Fee Examiners (herein after referred to as Assistant Stamp Reporter) by promotion from amongst the Judicial Assistants or Officials in the equivalent or above grade, but below that grade of Assistant Stamp Reporter. The Judicial Assistants are placed in the grade, now Pay Level-08, and the Assistant Stamp Reporter is placed at Pay Level-11 in the pay matrix. The petitioners after

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top