IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR
Anand Pathak, Hirdesh
National Health Mission – Appellant
Versus
Richa Saxena – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Anand Pathak, J.
1. The present appeal under Section 2 (1) of the Madhya Pradesh Uchcha Nyayalaya (Khand Nyaypeeth Ko Appeal) Adhiniyam, 2005 is preferred by the appellant/respondent No.2 being crestfallen by the order dated 20-07-2024 passed by learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No.15348 of 2024 whereby the writ petition filed by the respondent (hereinafter referred to as “the petitioner”) has been allowed.
2. Precisely stated facts of the case are that the petitioner was appointed as Family Planning Counselor on contract basis in 2007 and thereafter the said post was given the nomenclature as Block Community Mobilizer on which petitioner was again appointed on contract basis on 19-08-2021. Contract period of petitioner was extended by the appellant from time to time. A show cause notice dated 22-03-2024 was issued to the petitioner indicating lapses occurred in discharge of duties and poor performance of duties by the petitioner. Petitioner replied to the same on 05-04-2024 explaining all the allegations levelled against her. Finding the reply of the petitioner unsatisfactory, the appellant terminated the contractual services of petitioner. Being aggrieved by the sam





Krushnakant B. Parmar Vs. Union of India & Anr.
Rahul Tripathi Vs. Rajeev Gandhi Shiksha Mission, Bhopal
The Mission Director, National Health Mission, Bhopal Vs. Mukesh Yadav and others
Poonam Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and others
A.P. Social Welfare Residential Educational Institutions Vs. Pindiga Sridhar
Haryana Financial Corpn. Vs. Kailash Chandra Ahuja
State of Chhattisgarh Vs. Dhirjo Kumar Senger
Indu Bhushan Dwivedi Vs. State of Jharkhand
Natwar Singh Vs. Director of Enforcement
Dharampal Satyapal Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise, Gauhati and Ors
The court affirmed that natural justice principles apply even in contractual employment but can be flexible; proper opportunity must be given, but not always in the traditional sense.
Termination of contractual employment must adhere to principles of natural justice, especially when allegations of misconduct are involved.
The contract-based employment does not entitle the employee to the protections of Article 311, thus allowing termination based on performance without a full departmental inquiry.
Termination of a contractual employee citing indiscipline and negligence without a proper inquiry violates Article 311(2) and the principles of natural justice, rendering the termination invalid.
Termination orders based on misconduct must adhere to natural justice principles, ensuring employees have a fair opportunity to defend themselves.
The termination of services should be made by the appointing authority, and proper opportunity of hearing must be provided before making a decision with serious implications.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the principle of natural justice should be applied based on the nature of the inquiry and the opportunity of hearing provided, and that admiss....
The obligation to hold an enquiry before imposition of major punishment and the principles of natural justice must be adhered to in cases of termination of service.
Termination of contractual employment must adhere to principles of fairness and non-arbitrariness, ensuring equal treatment under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.