Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR
Gurpal Singh Ahluwalia
Manju Rai – Appellant
Versus
State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks relief under article 226 (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. state argues against the petitioner's entitlement to relief (Para 5) |
| 3. determination of the nature of the ordinance's effect (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. nature of statutory rights versus procedural laws (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. explanation of retrospective and retroactive statutes (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 6. amendment handling of no-confidence motions (Para 22 , 23) |
| 7. court concurs on ordinance's application to ongoing proceedings (Para 24 , 25) |
| 8. no vested right found in pending no-confidence motions (Para 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 9. court addresses the uncertainty created by the ordinance's application (Para 29 , 30) |
| 10. court's final decision on the ordinance's retroactive application (Para 31 , 32) |
ORDER :
Gurpal Singh Ahluwalia, J.
This Petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed seeking the following relief (s) :
(i) Pass an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction in the nature of certiorari, or any similar Writ setting aside the impugned order dated 23.08.2024 passed by Respondent No.4, in the light of Policy decision dated 20.08.2024 of the cabinet and order dated 23.08.2024 passe
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
