IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
PREM NARAYAN SINGH, J.
Prateek Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh And Others – Respondent
Criminal Revision No. 4467 of 2022 With Criminal Revision No. 810 of 2023
Decided On : 21-08-2024
ORDER :
PREM NARAYAN SINGH, J.
1. Both the criminal revision petitions have been arising out of the same impugned order, hence both are being decided with this common order. For the sake of convenience, the facts are being taken from CRR No.4467/2022.
2. These petitions have been filed by the petitioners under Section 397 read with Section 401 of Cr.P.C. against the order of framing of charges against the petitioners under Sections 420 , 468 of IPC , 1860 passed by Second Additional Sessions Judge, Mahidpur, District Ujjain in S.T No.11/2022 vide dated 02.11.2022.
3. As per the prosecution story, one Chand Mohmaad Kha Mevati was the owner and in possession of the Land bearing Survey No, 812/1 and 812/2 located at Village Ghosla, Tehsil Mahidpur, Dist. Ujjain, MP. After his death his Legal Heirs, namely, Jaitun Bee and Shankuran Bee D/o Chand Mohmaad Kha Mevati became the owner of the said Property. That, on 28.01.2009 Jaitun bee D/o Chand Kha Mevati sold the survey no. 812/2 to Prakashkuwar w/o Jaswant Singh vide registered sale deed dated 28.01.2009. And on 17.07.2009 Shakuran Bee D/o Chand Kha. Mevati sold the survey no. 812/1 to Hariram s/o Jairamji Jaat vide registered sale deed dated 17.07.2009. Applicant purchased the land bearing Survey No. 812/2 from Smt.' Prakeshkuvar w/o Jaswant Singh and Survey 812/1 from Hariram s/o Jairamji both located at Village Ghosla, Tehsil Mahidpur, Dist. Ujjain, M.P. vide registered sale deed dated 16.11.2009. thereafter Applicant executed registered Power of Attorney in favor of one Vardhman Gadiya s/o Amrutlal Gadiya (petitioner of CRA No.810/2023) to deal with the aforesaid property for the period commencing from 05.01.2012 to 04.01.2013. thereafter in the year 2012 Respondent no.02 Purchased the aforesaid property from Applicant vide registered Sale Deed dated 29.12.2012. On 29.12.2012 Respondent no. 02 filed an Application for Mutation of his name in revenue records with respect to aforesaid property before the Ld. Tehsildar, Ghosla, Tehsil Mahidpur, Dist. Ujjain, MP. One Bherulal s/o Kanchan Singh raised objections before the Ld. Tehsildar in the mutation |proceedings but the said Application was allowed by the Ld. Tehsildar vide its order dated 23.02.2013 and accordingly the name of Respondent no. 02 was mutated in revenue records with respect to the said Property. On 19.02.2013 Respondent no. 02 was added as a party to the ongoing Civil Suit No.65-A/2014 for Declaration of Title and Permanent Injunction on aforesaid property. The said Civil Suit was filed by Bherulal against Prateek Kumar and Others before the Civil Judge, Mahidpur, Dist. Ujjain, MP. which was Decreed by the Ld. Court on 27.04.2015.
4. Thereafter respondent no.02 filed an Appeal before the Ld. ADJ, Mahidpur, Dist. Ujjain, MP challenging the Order dated 27.04.2015 and the said Appeal was dismissed by the Ld. Court vide its order dated 13.08.2019. On 03/07/2018 a Complaint was filed by Respondent no.02 against the Applicant and other co-accused persons namely Vardhman Gadiya s/o Amrutlal Gadiya and Narendra Kumar s/o Sundarlal Nahar. It was alleged by the Respondent no. 02 in the said complaint that in the year 2012 he purchased a land bearing Survey No. 812/1 and 812/2 located at Village Ghosla, Tehsil Mahidpur, Dist. Ujjain, M.P. from Applicant vide registered sale deed dated 29/12/2012 and allegedly paid Rs. 10,00,000/- in lieu of sale consideration. It has been-further alleged by respondent no. 02 that the Sale Deed dated 29.12.2012 was executed by the co-accused Vardhman Gadiya as he was appointed as agent by the Applicant to deal with the said Property vide registered Power of Attorney dated 05.01.2012. It has been further alleged that on 19.02.2013 Respondent no. 02 received summons of Court whereby he was added as a party.
5. It is alleged that the present petitioners were well within the knowledge that the said land was already sold to one Bherulal by registered sale deed dated 07.06.1999. It is also within the kno
The concealment of prior ownership during a property sale constitutes prima facie evidence of cheating, while insufficient evidence exists for forgery charges.
There must be a prima facie case for a cognizance order; if facts only reveal a civil dispute, the criminal proceedings cannot proceed.
To attract the offence of forgery, the accused must be the maker of the forged document. The court also emphasized the importance of providing due opportunity to address arguments and the limitations....
Execution of sale deeds exceeding a co-sharer’s share does not constitute forgery or cheating, reaffirming that civil disputes should not be criminalized without clear offences being present.
The primary legal principle established is that the framing of charges requires only a prima facie case to be established, and the court should not delve into the merits of the evidence at this stage....
A criminal complaint for forgery and cheating cannot be sustained merely because a party enters into a property transaction despite a defective title originating from previously declared invalid docu....
It is well settled that in order to constitute an offence of cheating, it must be shown that the accused had fraudulent or dishonest intention at the time of making the representation or promise and ....
Term “criminal conspiracy” is defined under Section 120A of the IPC as to mean when two or more persons agree to do, or cause to be done, an illegal act, or an act with is not illegal by illegal mean....
A mere breach of contract does not amount to cheating or criminal liability unless a fraudulent or dishonest intention is shown to exist at the inception of the transaction. Similarly, execution of a....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.