IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
PREM NARAYAN SINGH
Prateek Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER :
PREM NARAYAN SINGH, J.
1. Both the criminal revision petitions have been arising out of the same impugned order, hence both are being decided with this common order. For the sake of convenience, the facts are being taken from CRR No.4467/2022.
2. These petitions have been filed by the petitioners under Section 397 read with Section 401 of Cr.P.C. against the order of framing of charges against the petitioners under Sections 420 , 468 of IPC , 1860 passed by Second Additional Sessions Judge, Mahidpur, District Ujjain in S.T No.11/2022 vide dated 02.11.2022.
3. As per the prosecution story, one Chand Mohmaad Kha Mevati was the owner and in possession of the Land bearing Survey No, 812/1 and 812/2 located at Village Ghosla, Tehsil Mahidpur, Dist. Ujjain, MP. After his death his Legal Heirs, namely, Jaitun Bee and Shankuran Bee D/o Chand Mohmaad Kha Mevati became the owner of the said Property. That, on 28.01.2009 Jaitun bee D/o Chand Kha Mevati sold the survey no. 812/2 to Prakashkuwar w/o Jaswant Singh vide registered sale deed dated 28.01.2009. And on 17.07.2009 Shakuran Bee D/o Chand Kha. Mevati sold the survey no. 812/1 to Hariram s/o Jairamji Jaat vide registered sale deed da
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.