ARINDAM LODH
Padma Mohan Jamatia – Appellant
Versus
Jharna Das Baidya Wife of Shri. Koushik Baidya – Respondent
Arindam Lodh, J.
The present criminal revision petition has been preferred against the order dated 16.12.2017 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gomati, Udaipur in case No. CR(CC)21 of 2017 wherein the learned Court has dismissed the complaint filed by the petitioner under Section 190 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for taking cognizance of the offence committed under Sections 153(a), 153(b), 504, 505 and 506 of IPC.
2. The facts, in a nutshell, are that one Sri Padma Mohan Jamatia filed a complaint petition under Section 190 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the accused-respondent, Smt. Jharna Das Baidya that she, being a Member of Parliament and leader of the CPI (M) party, had delivered certain speech on 30.11.2017 at Karbuk under Gomati district. It has been alleged in the complaint that in the said speech, the accused-respondent threatened by stating, that after the 2018 assembly elections were over, the president of State BJP, Sri Biplab Deb and its Chief Campaigner, Sri Sunil Deodhar would not be in the State but the BJP party workers, being the people of the State, would remain in the State and they would have to face dire consequences.
3. The
B. Saha and Ors. Vs. M. S. Kochar
C. R. Bansi Vs. The State of Maharashtra
Fiona Shrikhande Vs. State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Harihar Prasad Vs. State of Bihar
Srikantiah Ramayya Munnipalli Vs. State of Bombay
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.