Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.DHANDAPANI
S. Abdul Munab – Appellant
Versus
District Collector, Chengalpet – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's entitlement to pay fixation (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments regarding pay fixation errors (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. clarifications on proper pay fixation rules (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. court's interpretation of fr 22-b (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 5. prioritization of fundamental rules over rulings (Para 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 6. final decision and dismissal of writ petition (Para 27 , 28) |
ORDER :
Seeking refixation of pay at Rs.2050/= with effect from 01.10.1992 and for consequential sanction one annual increment and enhancement of pay and to grant all arrears of monetary benefits, including enhancement of monthly pension and to sanction all arrears on the basis of the recommendation of the 1st respondent, the present writ petition has been filed.
3. It is the further case of the petitioner that upon his promotion as Extension Officer on 30.01.1992, as the time scale of pay in the higher post was the less than the pay drawn by him, the petitioner exercised his option to fix his pay in the higher post of Extension Officer after sanctioning one annual increment due on 01.10.1992 in the lower post of Resident Welfare Officer Grade-I. It
The proper interpretation of pay fixation rules under FR 22-B and associated rulings dictates that prior option exercised by a government servant must be adhered to, ensuring benefits are computed co....
Service Law - Scale of pay - In view of amendment of ROP,1999 by Fifth Amendment insofar as our case is concerned, this subsequent amendment under Eighteenth Amendment Rules did not have any further ....
The court determined that erroneous pay fixation claims are continuous wrongs, allowing for revision regardless of delayed action on behalf of the employee.
The court established that the increments earned during a penalty period must be restored upon its expiry when the penalty order specifies no postponement of future increments.
Retrospective withdrawal of accrued financial benefits under the 5th CPC without proper legislative authority violates principles of natural justice and the rule of law, affecting vested rights and e....
Employees are entitled to pay protection on transfer even if the probation period is not completed, and pay reductions without notice violate natural justice.
Appointment to higher post with greater duties and responsibilities, evidenced by higher pay scale, entitles government servant to pay fixation under FR 22(I)(a)(1) with one increment, not FR 22(I)(a....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
