AKIL KURESHI
Vaswati Sharma D/o Maheswar Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of Tripura, Rep. by the Principal Secretary – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The petitioner has prayed for regularizing her in service w.e.f. 14.02.2002, i.e. on completion of 10 years of service with all consequential benefits. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner, however, submitted that the expectation of the petitioner is for being granted regularization w.e.f. 01.07.2008 as provided in office memorandum dated 01.09.2008 issued by the State Government.
2. Briefly stated the facts are that the petitioner was appointed as temporary fixed pay worker (clerical) under an order dated 15.02.1992 by the Notified Area Authority, Dharmanagar. This Notified Area Authority was later on upgraded as Dharmanagar Nagar Panchayat and thereafter to the status of Dharmanagar Municipal Council. All the employees of the Notified Area Authority automatically became the employees of Dharmanagar Municipal Council.
3. The petitioner would point out that the Government of Tripura framed a scheme for regularization of DRW, Casual and Contingent Workers upon completion of 10 years of service under office memorandum dated 01.09.2008. This office memorandum provided that the Government had taken a decision to regularize services of full-time DRW, Casual and Cont
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.