HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA
Arindam Lodh, J.
Gopendra Suklabaiya - Appellant
Versus
State of Tripura & Ors. - Respondents
WP(C) No. 762 of 2020
Decided On : 15-11-2021
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court's initial hearing and observation (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioner's employment and wage issues (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. arguments on regularization and delay (Para 5 , 7) |
| 4. court's analysis of policy and rights (Para 6 , 8) |
JUDGMENT
The matter was heard on 07.10.2021 at length and the judgment was passed orally in open Court. But, after passing the judgment this court found some errors on factual aspects which were not brought to the notice of the court and as such, fixed the matter at the column “Speaking to the Minutes” for re-hearing.
2. Today (15.11.2021) I heard again Mr. P. Roy Barman, learned Sr. counsel assisted by Ms. A. Debbarma, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mrs. S. Deb, learned counsel appearing for the State-respondents.
3. By way of filing the present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for regularization and restoration of his service.
4. The facts in brief are that the petitioner was engaged as Daily Rated Worker (DRW) on 19.04.2003. It is his grievance that since October, 2019 he was not paid of his wages and not allowed to continue his job as Casual Worker under the respondents.
5. Mr. Roy Barman, learned Sr. counsel has submitted that the service of the petitioner as Casual Worker should be regularized granting regular pay scale applicable for a Group ‘D’ employee. Admittedly, the petitioner was engaged as a Casual Worker on 19.04.2003 and he did not come within the purview of the policy declared by the State respondents vide Memorandum dated 1st September, 2008 and 21st January, 2009, which provided that the persons who were irregularly engaged as Casual/Contingent/Daily Rated Worker with financial concurrence and completed 10 years of service as on 31.03.2008 would be eligible for regularization. However, the State-respondents i.e. the Finance Department, Government of Tripura had taken policy dated 03.01.2014 after being noticed that some of such Casual/Contingent/Daily Rated Workers were engaged after 31.03.2003 and the State-respondents in their own wisdom had taken a policy to regularize the services of those Casual/Contingent/Daily Rated Workers who had completed 10 years of service on their engagement after 31.03.2003 with prior concurrence of the Finance Department. Admittedly, the petitioner was engaged on 19.04.2003 i.e. after 31.03.2003. The competent authority under which the petitioner was engaged had made correspondence with the Director of School Education informing him that the petitioner was engaged on 19.04.2003 as Casual Worker and has been serving the department with the consent of the Finance Department of the State Government and also had completed 10 years of service. As per the policy decision of the Government dated 03.01.2014, the service of the petitioner ought to have been regularized w.e.f. the next date of completion of 10 years of service i.e. w.e.f. 20.04.2013.
6. In pursuance of the policy dated 03.01.2014, the Principal, Government Degree College, Dharmanagar, North Tripura, made a communication dated 27th January, 2014 to the Director of Higher Education, Government of Tripura [Annexure 12 to the writ petition] wherein he was informed about the status of the petitioner. But for certain reasons the service of the petitioner was not regularized. But, admittedly, the service of the petitioner was continued by the respondents and his wages were being paid. All on a sudden, the Principal, Government Degree College, Dharmanagar, North Tripura vide communication dated 4th December, 2019 had informed the petitioner that his salary was held up from October, 2019 in view of the Memorandum dated 31st July,2018, which was issued by the Under Secretary, Government of Tripura, Finance Department. It is noticed that the State-respondents to ensure transparent public employment policy for engagement of staff for such services, all the memorandums were repealed. The wages of the petitioner was held up and he was not allowed to continue his service under th
The continuation of service and accrued rights entitles a Daily Rated Worker to regularization, notwithstanding policy repeal.
Irregular employment does not preclude regularization where a clear policy for the regularization of such workers exists, reaffirming legislative intent to remedy historical employment practices.
Regularization of casual workers after 10 years of service is mandated under government schemes, emphasizing equality and non-discrimination irrespective of engagement dates.
Policy for regularization must honor prior engagements if criteria are met, despite subsequent changes in policy restricting claims.
Welfare policies for employee regularization must be applied fairly to long-serving workers, emphasizing equitable treatment irrespective of technical cutoff dates.
The court ruled that a petitioner, employed as a daily wage worker, is entitled to regularization from an earlier date despite a shortfall of service days caused by health issues, emphasizing the Dep....
Employment and Service matter - Regularization of Service - Benefits of - Ability of Municipal Council and Panchayats to pay regular scales to temporary staff irrespective of existence of vacancies, ....
The court established that the arbitrary denial of regularization of services for Daily Rated Workers after ten years of service violates principles of equality and non-discrimination in employment.
The court affirmed that prior service as casual workers must be counted towards eligibility for regularization as Daily Rated Workers under government policies.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.