Back
S. G. CHATTOPADHYAY
Debashish Das – Appellant
Versus
State of Tripura – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner-husband challenges maintenance order (Para 1 , 4) |
| 2. arguments regarding income and maintenance (Para 2 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. court hears parties and considers evidence (Para 3 , 6) |
| 4. family court determines maintenance based on evidence (Para 7) |
| 5. final maintenance directive issued (Para 10 , 11) |
JUDGMENT
This criminal revision petition under Section 397 Cr.P.C read with Section 19 of the FAMILY COURTS ACT ,1984 has been filed by the petitioner-husband challenging the judgment and order dated 12.03.2020 passed by the Family Court, Sonamura in Criminal Misc. 52 of 2018 whereby the Family Court granted monthly maintenance allowance of a sum of Rs.15,000/- towards maintenance of the respondent-wife and her minor daughter and directed the petitioner-husband to remit the money to his wife within 7th day of each month by money order.
[2] By means of filing this criminal revision petition, petitioner-husband has challenged the impugned judgment of the Family Court mainly on the following grounds:
(i) The Family Court did not appreciate the fact that the respondent-wife could not adduce any documentary proof to prove the income of the petitioner. Without ascertaining his i
A husband has a legal obligation to maintain his wife and children, which cannot be ignored despite personal hardships or the wife's income capacity.
The main legal point established is that under section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, a spouse who is capable of maintaining themselves may be denied maintenance allowance, but the responsibi....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's authority to enhance the maintenance amount under Section 125 Cr.P.C. based on the income of the respondent-husband and the needs of th....
The court upheld the order for maintenance based on the husband's income and the wife's inability to maintain herself under Section 125 of Cr.P.C.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the husband's liability to pay maintenance if the wife is unable to maintain herself and if the husband has sufficient means, as per Section 125....
The court emphasized the financial capacity of the husband and the settled position of law regarding the commencement date of maintenance payments.
three children are under the custody of their mother/ petitioner. Since the petitioner is a guardian of their children she has to maintain the education and marriage of the children etc. Further, the....
(1) Income of spouse is one of prime considerations for determination of maintenance allowance to wife and children.(2) Husband cannot be permitted to ignore his responsibility for maintaining his di....
The court affirmed the maintenance amount of Rs.10,500 as just and proper, finding no evidence to support the petitioner's claim for a higher amount amidst financial considerations.
Family Courts must ensure maintenance awards are just and reasonable, taking into account both parents' financial capabilities and the child's specific needs, to promote the child's welfare post-divo....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
