SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Tri) 278

T. AMARNATH GOUD
Mousumi Akter – Appellant
Versus
Md. Ikbal Hossain – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. M. Pal, Advocate., for the Petitioner(s); Mr. T. Chakraborty, Advocate., for the Respondent(s)

JUDGMENT

1. The present revision petition is filed under Section 397 & 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 read with Section 19 of the Family Court Act 1984, against the impugned judgment and order dated 04.04.2022 passed by the learned Addl. Judge, Family Court, West Tripura in connection with Case No. Criminal Misc. No.406 of 2018, wherein the learned Addl. Judge, Family Court passed an order directing the respondent to pay maintenance of Rs.10,500/- every month to the revision petitioner.

2. The prosecution story, in brief, is that marriage between the petitioner-wife and respondent-husband was solemnized on 11.12.2005 as per Muslim rites and customs, in presence of the parents, relatives, and friends of both sides. Out of their wedlock, they gave birth to a female child on 11.09.2009. After that, the respondent-husband got a job offer as a Constable from Tripura police and he joined police training at the KTDS Police Training Academy. After the completion of the training period, the respondent-husband joined at Unakoti District. At that period, he started avoiding his wife as well as her minor daughter. When the respondent-husband came back home on leave, the petitioner

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top