SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Tri) 321

S. G. CHATTOPADHYAY
Pravas Barman – Appellant
Versus
Arpit Barman – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. A.K. Pal, Advocate, for the Petitioner; Mr. Diptanu Debnath, Advocate, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

1. This criminal revision petition is directed against the order dated 27.07.2021 passed by the Family Court, Agartala in Crl. Misc.603 of 2019 whereby the Family Court has directed the petitioner to pay monthly maintenance allowance of a sum of Rs.10,000/- to his son Arpit Barman w.e.f. 01.10.2019 by depositing the same in the bank account of his mother who is the divorced wife of the petitioner.

2. The fact of the case in brief is that marriage between the petitioner and Smt. Helan Sarkar was dissolved on mutual consent by a judgment dated 28.09.2016 passed by the Family Court, Agartala in Title Suit (Divorce) 351 of 2015 and at the time of granting divorce, permanent alimony payable to the wife of the petitioner was settled at Rs.3,50,000/- which has already been paid by the petitioner to his divorced wife Smt. Helan Sarkar. It was also settled between the parties that their son would live with his mother. Pursuant to the decree of divorce, the spouses were separated from each other and they started living separately. The petitioner husband has, by this time, remarried. On 01.10.2019, divorced wife of the petitioner filed a petition in the Family Court, Agartala alleging

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top