SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Tri) 123

S. TALAPATRA
Rekha Harijan – Appellant
Versus
State of Tripura – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. R. Datta, Advocate, for the Petitioner; Mr. P. K. Dhar, Sr. Adv., Mr. A. Dey, Advocate, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

Heard Mr. R. Datta, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as Mr. P. K. Dhar, learned Sr. G.A. assisted by Mr. A. De, learned counsel appearing for the respondents.

[2] By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has urged this court for directing the respondents to regularize her service in the post under Group-D category for completion of ten years service, with all service benefits including the back wages and seniority with effect from 01.07.2009. The petitioner has asserted that the petitioner belongs to the Scheduled Cast (SC) Community and she was engaged as the Contract Based Worker (CBW) with effect from June, 1999. In this regard, an informative table formed by the respondents [Annexure-4 to the writ petition] has been relied by the petitioner. From the said table, it can be derived that the petitioner was engaged as CBW. Similarly situated persons namely Arati Debnath and Nikunja Debnath (both CBWs) who were junior to the petitioner had been regularized in the Group-D post under direction from this court and in terms of the memorandum dated 01.09.2008.

[3] Mr. Datta, learned counsel appearing for the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top