Back
INDRAJIT MAHANTY, S. G. CHATTOPADHYAY
Nishan Tripura – Appellant
Versus
Secretary – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. irregularities in health scheme fund usage. (Para 2) |
| 2. dispute on the petitioner's standing and state response. (Para 3 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. discussion on locus standi in public interest litigation. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. summary of irregularities found in the audit. (Para 16) |
| 5. court directions for state action on audit findings. (Para 18 , 19) |
ORDER
S.G. Chattopadhyay, J. - This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner making allegations of misuse and defalcation of public funds during implementation of various health schemes by the State officials and others which has been registered as a Public Interest Litigation (PIL).
2. The basic facts and controversy brought before this Court are as follows:
From newspaper reports and the report of internal audit conducted by the Senior Audit Officer of the State Directorate of Audit for the period from 01.04.2006 to 31.03.2015 and from various other documents supplied to the petitioner under the Right to Information Act, 2005, petitioner came to know that various irregularities were committed and huge amount of fund was misused and defalcated by the officers involved i
In public interest litigation, a petitioner must demonstrate bona fide intent and sufficient interest, avoiding vexatious claims; the court may intervene if allegations of public fund misuse are subs....
Public Interest Litigation must meet strict bona fides and credential requirements to prevent misuse for personal gain.
The court emphasized the need for petitioners in public interest litigation to come with clean hands and be above suspicion, and laid down parameters to prevent misuse of public interest litigation.
Point of Law : Courts must do justice by promotion of good faith, and prevent law from crafty invasions. Courts must maintain the social balance by interfering where necessary for the sake of justice....
Public Interest Litigation - Health delivery system in the State of Uttar Pradesh - Not maintainable as petition not espousing cause of any member of a disadvantageous section of society or any perso....
Public Interest Litigation requires genuine public interest and appropriate standing; repeated petitions without addressing prior judicial concerns are not maintainable.
The judgment emphasizes the importance of following proper legal procedures for lodging a complaint or initiating an inquiry, and highlights the requirement of obtaining prior approval for investigat....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
