SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Tri) 99

INDRAJIT MAHANTY, S. G. CHATTOPADHYAY
Nishan Tripura – Appellant
Versus
Secretary – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. A. Debbarma, Adv, for the Appellant, Mr. M. Debbarma, Addl. Ga, for the Respondent.

ORDER

S.G. Chattopadhyay, J. - This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner making allegations of misuse and defalcation of public funds during implementation of various health schemes by the State officials and others which has been registered as a Public Interest Litigation (PIL).

2. The basic facts and controversy brought before this Court are as follows:

From newspaper reports and the report of internal audit conducted by the Senior Audit Officer of the State Directorate of Audit for the period from 01.04.2006 to 31.03.2015 and from various other documents supplied to the petitioner under the Right to Information Act, 2005, petitioner came to know that various irregularities were committed and huge amount of fund was misused and defalcated by the officers involved in the implementation of ASHA training and various other health schemes across the State. Seeking intervention of Court, petitioner has filed this public interest petition and sought for the following directions:

(i) To call for the relevant records from the custody of the State respondents.

(ii) To issue direction to the State respondents to initiate departmental proce

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top