SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Tri) 126

S. TALAPATRA, S. G. CHATTOPADHYAY
Shampa Datta – Appellant
Versus
Sougat Das – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. D. K. Daschoudhury, Adv., for the Appellant; Mr. A. Sengupta, Adv., for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

1. Heard Mr. D. K. Daschoudhury, learned counsel appearing for the appellant as well as Mr. A. Sengupta, learned counsel appearing for the respondent.

2. By means of this appeal, the judgment and decree respectively dated 21.07.2018 and 30.07.2018 delivered in TS(Divorce) 45 of 2015 by the Judge, Family Court, Udaipur, Gomati has been called in question. By the said judgment, the Judge, Family Court has granted the divorce on the ground of cruelty within the ambit of Section-13(1)(a) of the HINDU MARRIAGE ACT , 1955. The Judge, Family Court while passing the said judgment has observed that from the evidence it becomes clear that the respondent [the appellant] had stayed in the house of the petitioner [the respondent in this appeal] that one year and few months only and thereafter the parties had been leaving separately for last four years.

3. The respondent has asserted in her written statement that though she used to do the household works, yet she did not get any appreciation at all. It is no denying fact that in our society after marriage the bride is to leave her parental home from her matrimonial home and she is to adapt with the environment of her husband and the matri

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top