SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Tri) 105

S. TALAPATRA
Ratan Chakraborty – Appellant
Versus
State of Tripura – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. S Lodh, Advocate, for the Petitioner; Mr. D Bhattacharjee, GA, Mr. S Saha, Advocate, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

1. Heard Mr. S Lodh, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as Mr. D Bhattacharjee, learned GA assisted by Mr. S Saha, learned counsel appearing for the respondents.

2. This is the second round of litigation by these 9 (nine) petitioners. On earlier occasion they filed the writ petitions separately. The petitioner No. 1, Sri Ratan Chakraborty, filed the writ petition being WP(C) No. 140/2020, the petitioner No.2, Sri Sudhamoy Chakraborty, filed the writ petition being WP(C) No. 137/2020, the petitioner No.3, Sri Shanti Bhusan Chakraborty, filed the writ petition being WP(C) No. 138/2020, the petitioner No.4, Sri Mrinal Kanti Chakraborty, filed the writ petition being WP(C) No. 139/2020, the petitioner No.5, Sri Siddhartha Chakraborty, filed the writ petition being WP(C) No. 139/2020, the petitioner No.6, Sri Ashish Kumar Dey, filed the writ petition being WP(C) No. 141/2020, the petitioner No.7, Sri Kalipada Paul, filed the writ petition being WP(C) No. 142/2020, the petitioner No.8, Smt. Tamashi Choudhury, filed the writ petition being WP(C) No. 143/2020, the petitioner No.9, Sri Arun Kumar Singha, filed the writ petition being WP(C) No. 144/2020. All those w

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top