SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Guj) 1841

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
NIKHIL S. KARIEL
Vinodkumar Kantiji Thakor – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: For the Appellant :Yogendra Thakore For the Respondents: Nirali Sarda, Kamlesh S. Kotai

ORDER :

1. Heard learned Advocate for the petitioners and learned AGP for the respondent State.

2. Issue Rule. Learned AGP and learned Advocate for the respective respondent waive service of Rule.

3. At the outset, learned Advocate for the petitioners would submit that the issue raised in these petition is covered by a decision of this Court in Special Civil Application No.10738 of 2020 and allied matters dated 14.03.2024 and whereas it is submitted that the said decision with a modification had been confirmed by the Division Bench. It is submitted by the learned Advocate for the petitioners that since the petitioners are similarly situated to the petitioners of the above writ petitions, the same benefit as modified by the Division Bench, may be accorded to the present petitioners.

4. Learned AGP and learned Advocate for the District Panchayat would not dispute the proposition as having been submitted by learned Advocate for the petitioners.

5. It would appear that the petitioners before this Court, had been appointed on compassionate basis in terms of Government Resolution dated 15.06.2004, which prescribed the appointments on fixed pay on Ad-hoc basis for a period of 5 years and upon

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top