SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Tri) 113

T. AMARNATH GOUD, ARINDAM LODH
Manish Roy – Appellant
Versus
Sharmistha Saha (Roy) – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. P. Chakraborty, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. S. Lodh, Advocate, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

T. Amarnath Goud, J. - This is an appeal filed under Section 19 of the Family Court Act, 1984 against the Judgment and Decree dated 11.10.2018 passed in T.S.(Divorce) No.446/2011 by the learned Addl. Judge, Family Court, Agartala, West Tripura.

2. The appellant being the petitioner filed a case before the learned Judge, Family Court, Agartala, West Tripura, under Section 13(1)(ia) and (iii) of the HINDU MARRIAGE ACT , seeking Divorce from his wife which was numbered as T.S.(Divorce)446 of 2011.

3. The case of the petitioner, the appellant herein, in short, was that his marriage was solemnized with the respondent on 09.02.2011 as per Hindu Rites and Customs. The appellant is doing a job at Kolkata and he has his own flat at Kolkata. After marriage, both the appellant-husband and the respondent-wife came to Kolkata and the mother of the appellant accompanied them for setting up their new life. On 21.02.2011, the appellant and the respondent came to Kolkata and on that night the respondent-wife started quarrelling with the appellant on the ground that why the mother of the appellant-husband accompanied them and also threatened the appellant that if the mother of the appellant

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top