SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Tri) 273

T. AMARNATH GOUD, S. G. CHATTOPADHYAY
Pijush Kanti Das – Appellant
Versus
Priyanka Rani Das – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Ms. S. Debbarma, Advocate., for the Appellant(s); Ms. P. Chakraborty, Advocate., for the Respondent(s)

JUDGMENT

T. Amarnath Gond, J. - This is an appeal filed under Section 28 of the HINDU MARRIAGE ACT , 1955 read with Section 19 of the Family Courts' Act, 1984 against the judgment and decree dated 08.03.2021 passed by the learned Judge, Family Court, West Tripura, Agartala in case No.T.S. (Divorce) 385 of 2018, dismissing the divorce petition filed by the appellant.

2. The facts of the case, in brief, are that the marriage between the appellant, Sri Pijush Kanti Das was solemnized with the respondent Smt. Priyanka Rani Das on 18.02.2011, as per Hindu rites and customs after observing all formalities of Hindu marriage in the house of the father of the respondent at Madhya Laxmibil. After marriage, both the appellant and the respondent started living together as husband and wife, and from their wedlock, a son was born on 05.01.2012. It is alleged that after some days of marriage, the appellant-husband noticed that the respondent-wife started to frequent visit her parental home without any permission of her parents-in-law. Knowing from his parents, after inquiry, he tried to convince the respondent but she started a quarrel with the appellant and told him that he is not the man of her

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top