HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA
Indrajit Mahanty, CJ., S.G. Chattopadhyay, J.
Mani Rani Deb Dhar - Appellant
Versus
State of Tripura & Ors. - Respondents
WP(C) Nos. 277 & 278 of 2021
Decided On : 28-02-2022
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners challenge age limit for anganwadi workers. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. arguments concerning authority and policy on retirement age. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 3. court analysis on judicial review of policy decisions. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 4. decision to allow petitions based on earlier judgments. (Para 28) |
| 5. final disposal of petitions. (Para 29) |
JUDGMENT
S.G. Chattopadhyay, J. - The matter arises from a reference made by the learned Single Judge by his common order dated 15.11.2021 passed in WP(C) No.277 of 2021 and WP(C) No.278 of 2021.
2. By means of filing the writ petitions before the learned Single Judge, the petitioners who were Anganwadi workers under the scheme known as Integrated Child Development Services (ICDS) challenged a notification of the State Government whereby their age of retirement was fixed at 60 years and sought for a direction to the State Government to let them continue in service till they attain 65 years of age in terms of the guidelines issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Women and Child Development and circulated to the State Governments across the country under communication No.1-8/2012-CD-I dated 22.10.2012. For such reliefs, they relied on the judgment and order dated 29.06.2021 passed by a Division Bench of this court in WA No. 173 of 2021 [The State of Tripura & Ors. v. Rina Purkayasta].
3. The petitioners also relied on another order dated 27.08.2021 passed by the learned Single Judge (A. Lodh, J) of this court in the case of Smt. Silu Pal v. The State of Tripura & 6 Ors. [WP(C) No.242 of 2021]. The learned Single Judge (A. Lodh, J) by the order under reference has held that judgment rendered by the Division Bench in Rina Purkayashta (supra) and the judgment rendered in Smt. Silu Pal (supra) are not in consonance with the policy decision of the Government and the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court rendered in the case of State of Karnataka & Ors. v. Ameerbi & Ors. reported in (2007) 11 SCC 681 and on this ground learned Single Judge (A. Lodh, J) has referred the matter to the Chief Justice to constitute appropriate bench to resolve the issue. Accordingly this bench has been constituted to decide the matter.
4. The factual context, in greater detail, is as under: Smt. Mani Rani Deb Dhar and Smt. Archana Pal Dey, petitioners before the learned Single Judge were engaged as Anganwadi workers for implementation of child development programmes under the Integrated Child Development Services shortly known as ICDS within the State of Tripura. In the course of their engagement, they were given training and entrusted with duties and responsibilities which included implementation of menu based nutrition programme for expectant mothers and children upto the age of 6 years, non formal pre-school activities of children of the age group of 3-5 years, home visits and collection of various data with regard to nutrition of children and expectant mothers etc. By a memorandum dated 15.05.2015 issued from the Education (Social Welfare & Social Education) Department, the State Government decided that the upper age limit of the honorarium based Anganwadi workers would be 60 years and under the said memorandum the respective child development project officers were asked to issue notice to the Anganwadi workers informing them that they would be disengaged on their attaining 60 years of age. For convenience, it would be appropriate to reproduce the said Memorandum which is as under:
'Government of Tripura
Education (Social Welfare & Social Education)
Department Malancha, Ujan Abhoynagar,
Agartala, Tripura Pin-799005
No.F.46(54)-ICDS/SW19/2015/7780(69) Dated, Agartala, the, 15/05/2015
M E M O R A N D U M
The upper age limit of the Anganwadi Workers (AWWs) and Anganwadi Helpers (AWHs) under Education (SW& SE) Department who are honorarium based workers has been fixed up to 60(sixty) years. 2. In view of above all the CDPOs
Karnataka & Ors. vs. Ameerbi & Ors.
Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors.
The retirement age of Anganwadi workers is subject to uniform standards set by central guidelines, overriding local policies that impose lower age limits, ensuring no arbitrary state action. All work....
No mandamus could be issued to force a particular age of discharge on the state government when its policy was not shown to be suffering from any illegality or irrationality.
State governments have discretion over service conditions of workers, including retirement age, especially under funded schemes without violating rights.
Anganwadi Workers are entitled to continue their service until the age of 65, overriding state policies that impose a limit of 60, as a violation of central government guidelines.
Anganwadi Workers are not considered civil servants, and thus, age relaxation provisions for government employees do not apply to them.
Judicial review of government policy allows intervention only if the policy is manifestly arbitrary or unconstitutional, not on grounds of suitability.
(1) Whether age of superannuation should be enhanced is a matter of policy. If a decision has been taken to enhance age of superannuation, date with effect from which enhancement should be made falls....
The court affirmed that all Class-IV employees must retire at 60 years, rejecting arbitrary distinctions based on engagement dates as discriminatory under Article 14.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that employees of the Orissa Water Supply and Sewerage Board, being governed by the rules and regulations applicable to State Government employees,....
Employees of autonomous bodies like the DRDA cannot claim parity with state government employees regarding retirement benefits unless explicitly provided by law or policy, and changes in retirement a....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.