SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Tri) 51

HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA
S. Talapatra, J.
Dalu Majumder - Appellant
Versus
State of Tripura & Ors. - Respondents
WP(C) 859 of 2021, WP(C) 692 of 2021, WP(C) 47 of 2022, WP(C) 824 of 2021, WP(C) 924 of 2021, WP(C) 925 of 2021, WP(C) 926 of 2021, WP(C) 927 of 2021, WP(C) 928 of 2021, WP(C) 930 of 2021, WP(C) 931 of 2021
Decided On : 25-03-2022

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Mr. Raju Datta, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. B Majumder, Asst. SG, Mr. B Majumder, CGC, Mr. D Sarma, Addl. GA, Mr. K De, Addl. GA, Mr. M Debbarma, Addl. GA, Mr. DC Saha, Adv, Mr. Anujit Dey, Advocate, for the Respondent

Anganwadi Workers are entitled to continue their service until the age of 65, overriding state policies that impose a limit of 60, as a violation of central government guidelines.

Headnote:(A) Integrated Child Development Scheme (ICDS) - Memorandum No. F.46(54)-ICDS/SWE/2015/7780 - Maximum age of disengagement for Anganwadi Workers and Helpers set at 60 years - Petitioner workers challenge the notifications citing violation of central guidelines allowing age up to 65 years - Court finds State's decision inconsistent with central policy and earlier court decisions. (Paras 4, 11, 12, 17)

(B) Employment Law - Right to Employment - Anganwadi Workers and Helpers have the right to continue in service until the age of 65 as per government guidelines - Mandates state compliance with central directives concerning retirement age. (Paras 10, 18)

Facts of the case:
This judgment addresses various writ petitions of Anganwadi Workers and Helpers in Tripura who have been disengaged upon reaching 60 years, contrary to the established central guideline permitting continued service until 65 years, which six workers sought to contest. (Paras 3, 5, 6)

Findings of Court:
The court determined that the notifications setting a maximum disengagement age of 60 years are invalid and mandated the continuation of services for Anganwadi Workers and Helpers until the age of 65 years. (Paras 17, 18)

Issues: Whether the maximum age limit for disengagement established by the State is permissible under the existing guidelines from the central government and prior rulings? (Paras 10, 12)

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized adherence to the central policies that allow for a retirement age of 65 years, ruling that the State had failed to demonstrate compelling reasons to deviate from this guideline. (Paras 10, 12)

Result: Writ petitions allowed; directives for continued service until 65 years issued, except one case requiring further action. (Paras 18, 19)

Table of Content
1. challenge to memoranda on disengagement age. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. petitioners seek continuation of service till 65 years. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
3. court affirms previous rulings on age limit. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)
4. impugned notifications set aside. (Para 17)
5. petitions allowed with directives. (Para 18 , 19)

JUDGMENT

1. All the above mentioned writ petitions are combined for disposal by a common judgment as in all these writ petitions a common relief has been sought and such relief has been claimed to have been covered by previous decisions of this court.

2. In these writ petitions, the petitioners, Anganwadi Workers (AWWs)/Anganwadi Helpers (AWHs) have challenged a few notifications and memoranda. Those are mostly common in all the writ petitions. For brevity, a catalogue of those notifications and memoranda are placed hereunder:

1. Notification No.46 (176) - ICDS/SWE/2012/1557(94) dated 07.07.2012 issued by the respondent No.2.

2. Memorandum No. F.46(54)-ICDS/SWE/2015/7780(69) dated 15.05.2015 issued by the respondent No.3 whereby the age of disengagement of Anganwadi Workers and Angangwadi Helpers has been fixed on completion of 60 years.

3. Memorandum No. F.1(6)-CDPO/MNP/15/390(4) dated 30.10.2021 issued by the respondent No.6 or the memorandum of like nature directing the petitioners to handover the complete charge to the Anganwadi Workers or Helpers on or before a certain date.

3. The writ petitioners are working under the Integrated Child Development Scheme (ICDS) as Anganwadi Worker or Anganwadi Helper in the State of Tripura. By the memorandum dated 15.05.2015, the maximum age of disengagement has been fixed at 60 years. On that ground, a few Anganwadi Workers or Anganwadi Helpers have been disengaged or terminated from their services for their attaining 60 years of age, in gross violation of the memorandum of the Government of India, as it is evident from the communication dated 19.07.2017 issued by the Ministry of Women & Child Development, Government of India under No.21-1/2017-CD.1 that as per the restructured 3rd phase of ICDS, the existing guidelines do not provide a uniform age limit for retirement of Anganwadi Workers. Rather to determine the maximum age limit, the task has been left to the State Governments. It has also been communicated that the maximum age limit of 65 years for Anganwadi Workers and Anganwadi Helpers has been supported by most of the State Governments at various forums. In view of the above, a uniform policy decision would be undertaken to discontinue the services of Anganwadi Workers and Anganwadi Helpers at the age of 65 years.

4. But contrary to the central policy, by the notification under No.46(176)-ICDS/SWE/2012/1557(94) dated 07.07.2012, the Government of Tripura published its decision by fixing the upper/maximum age limit of Anganwadi Workers and Anganwadi Helpers under the Education (SW&SE) Department, who were honorarium based workers, at the age of 60 years with immediate effect and until further orders. By the memorandum dated 15.05.2015, as referred above, all the CDPOs have been instructed to take follow up action for disengaging the Anganwadi Workers and Anganwadi Helpers who have attained 60 years of age. Accordingly, those Anganwadi Workers and Anganwadi Helpers, including the petitioners, received the memorandum on diverse dates issued by the Child Development Project Officer (CDPO) in respect of their disengagement and for handing over the charge, whatsoever is lying with them.

5. The petitioners are all similarly circumstanced and by means of these writ petitions they have urged this court for setting aside the Notification dated 07.07.2012 and Memorandum dated 15.05.2015 and other consequential memoranda directing the petitioners to handover the charge for their attaining the age of 60 years.

6. It has been further urged that the petitioners being the Anganwadi Workers and Anganwadi Helpers be allowed to continue in their services till t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top