HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA
S. Talapatra, J.
Dalu Majumder - Appellant
Versus
State of Tripura & Ors. - Respondents
WP(C) 859 of 2021, WP(C) 692 of 2021, WP(C) 47 of 2022, WP(C) 824 of 2021, WP(C) 924 of 2021, WP(C) 925 of 2021, WP(C) 926 of 2021, WP(C) 927 of 2021, WP(C) 928 of 2021, WP(C) 930 of 2021, WP(C) 931 of 2021
Decided On : 25-03-2022
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to memoranda on disengagement age. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. petitioners seek continuation of service till 65 years. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. court affirms previous rulings on age limit. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. impugned notifications set aside. (Para 17) |
| 5. petitions allowed with directives. (Para 18 , 19) |
JUDGMENT
1. All the above mentioned writ petitions are combined for disposal by a common judgment as in all these writ petitions a common relief has been sought and such relief has been claimed to have been covered by previous decisions of this court.
2. In these writ petitions, the petitioners, Anganwadi Workers (AWWs)/Anganwadi Helpers (AWHs) have challenged a few notifications and memoranda. Those are mostly common in all the writ petitions. For brevity, a catalogue of those notifications and memoranda are placed hereunder:
1. Notification No.46 (176) - ICDS/SWE/2012/1557(94) dated 07.07.2012 issued by the respondent No.2.
2. Memorandum No. F.46(54)-ICDS/SWE/2015/7780(69) dated 15.05.2015 issued by the respondent No.3 whereby the age of disengagement of Anganwadi Workers and Angangwadi Helpers has been fixed on completion of 60 years.
3. Memorandum No. F.1(6)-CDPO/MNP/15/390(4) dated 30.10.2021 issued by the respondent No.6 or the memorandum of like nature directing the petitioners to handover the complete charge to the Anganwadi Workers or Helpers on or before a certain date.
3. The writ petitioners are working under the Integrated Child Development Scheme (ICDS) as Anganwadi Worker or Anganwadi Helper in the State of Tripura. By the memorandum dated 15.05.2015, the maximum age of disengagement has been fixed at 60 years. On that ground, a few Anganwadi Workers or Anganwadi Helpers have been disengaged or terminated from their services for their attaining 60 years of age, in gross violation of the memorandum of the Government of India, as it is evident from the communication dated 19.07.2017 issued by the Ministry of Women & Child Development, Government of India under No.21-1/2017-CD.1 that as per the restructured 3rd phase of ICDS, the existing guidelines do not provide a uniform age limit for retirement of Anganwadi Workers. Rather to determine the maximum age limit, the task has been left to the State Governments. It has also been communicated that the maximum age limit of 65 years for Anganwadi Workers and Anganwadi Helpers has been supported by most of the State Governments at various forums. In view of the above, a uniform policy decision would be undertaken to discontinue the services of Anganwadi Workers and Anganwadi Helpers at the age of 65 years.
4. But contrary to the central policy, by the notification under No.46(176)-ICDS/SWE/2012/1557(94) dated 07.07.2012, the Government of Tripura published its decision by fixing the upper/maximum age limit of Anganwadi Workers and Anganwadi Helpers under the Education (SW&SE) Department, who were honorarium based workers, at the age of 60 years with immediate effect and until further orders. By the memorandum dated 15.05.2015, as referred above, all the CDPOs have been instructed to take follow up action for disengaging the Anganwadi Workers and Anganwadi Helpers who have attained 60 years of age. Accordingly, those Anganwadi Workers and Anganwadi Helpers, including the petitioners, received the memorandum on diverse dates issued by the Child Development Project Officer (CDPO) in respect of their disengagement and for handing over the charge, whatsoever is lying with them.
5. The petitioners are all similarly circumstanced and by means of these writ petitions they have urged this court for setting aside the Notification dated 07.07.2012 and Memorandum dated 15.05.2015 and other consequential memoranda directing the petitioners to handover the charge for their attaining the age of 60 years.
6. It has been further urged that the petitioners being the Anganwadi Workers and Anganwadi Helpers be allowed to continue in their services till t
Anganwadi Workers are entitled to continue their service until the age of 65, overriding state policies that impose a limit of 60, as a violation of central government guidelines.
State governments have discretion over service conditions of workers, including retirement age, especially under funded schemes without violating rights.
No mandamus could be issued to force a particular age of discharge on the state government when its policy was not shown to be suffering from any illegality or irrationality.
The retirement age of Anganwadi workers is subject to uniform standards set by central guidelines, overriding local policies that impose lower age limits, ensuring no arbitrary state action. All work....
The retirement age for Anganwadi workers is upheld at 65 years, with reinstatement ordered pending Supreme Court clarification.
Judicial review of government policy allows intervention only if the policy is manifestly arbitrary or unconstitutional, not on grounds of suitability.
Anganwadi Workers are not considered civil servants, and thus, age relaxation provisions for government employees do not apply to them.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the applicability of G.O.Ms.No.15, dtd. 31/1/2022, which enhanced the age of superannuation of Government Employees from 60 years to 62 years, t....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.