T. AMARNATH GOUD
Cholamandalam Ms General Insurance Company Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Bhudda Kumar Jamatia – Respondent
JUDGMENT
T. Amarnath Goud, J. - This is an appeal under Section 173 of the MOTOR VEHICLES ACT , 1988 read with Section 168 of the Act, by the appellant, Insurance Company, challenging the judgment and award dated 17.06.2019 passed by the Ld. Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, No. 2, Gomati Judicial District, Udaipur, Tripura, on case No. T.S.(MAC) 18 of 2017.
2. For the sake of brevity the parties are referred to as in the cause title of T.S.(MAC) 18 of 2017. The claim petition discloses the fact that on 16.06.2016 at about 8.30 a.m deceased Brajendra Jamatia was going to his house from Rani panchayat Chowmohani on foot keeping left side of the road and at that time, a Commander Jeep vehicle bearing No. TR-01-2323 came from right side to left side and dashed the deceased resulting to grievous injuries on his various parts of body and soon after the accident the deceased was taken to Kakraban PHC and considering the gravity of injuries he was referred to AGMC & GBP Hospital, Agartala where he died due to multiple grievous injuries. In the claim petition it was specifically pleaded that the accident occurred due to rash and negligent driving of the aforesaid Commander Jeep. It was again
M.H. Uma Maheshwari & Ors vs. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. & Anr
Compensation for loss of estate is fixed at Rs. 15,000 under Motor Vehicles Act principles, while care and attention compensation remains valid if justified.
The insurance company was held liable for compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, with the court reaffirming the validity of the insurance policy and proper compensation assessment methodologies.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for the insurer to establish a fundamental breach of the policy to avoid liability and the determination of notional income in the ....
Point of Law : Compensation on account of loss of love and affection is not permissible but compensation on account of spousal and parental consortium for children is admissible.
The family pension received by the wife of the deceased in a road traffic accident is not a "pecuniary advantage" and is not liable for deduction while determining the compensation under the provisio....
Just compensation principles affirming fair, reasonable evaluations for victims' families in road accident cases, including future earnings and consortium considerations.
The insurer can be held liable for compensation despite policy breaches if negligence by the driver caused the accident, and overloading alone does not exempt liability unless it contributed to the i....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.