SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2170

J. J. MUNIR
New India Assurance Co Ltd – Appellant
Versus
Laxmi Narayan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant : Amaresh Sinha.
For the Respondent: Ram Ashish Pandey.

Table of Content
1. overview of appeal and representation (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. details of the incident and claimants (Para 5 , 6)
3. defenses raised by the owner and insurers (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
4. issues framed for determination (Para 10 , 12 , 13)
5. arguments from both sides (Para 14 , 15 , 16)
6. court's evaluation of evidence (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21)
7. insurance policy implications (Para 22 , 23 , 24)
8. determination of compensation (Para 26 , 27 , 28)
9. recognition of rights under changing laws (Para 29 , 30 , 31)
10. final decision on the appeal (Para 34 , 35 , 36)

JUDGMENT

J.J. Munir,J.

This appeal is directed against the judgment and award of Mr. V.K. Tyagi, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/ Special Judge (Essential Commodities Act), Etawah dated 17.08.2004, partly allowing Claim Petition No.70 of 2001.

2. Heard Mr. Anubhav Sinha, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Amaresh Sinha, learned Counsel for the appellant/ Insurance Company and Mr. Ram Ashish Pandey, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no. 1/1, the claimant.

3. The original claimants are respondent Nos.1 and 2 to the appeal, to wit, Laxmi Narayan Dubey and Smt. Kusum wife of Laxmi Narayan Dubey. Pending appeal, the cl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top