SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Tri) 411

T. AMARNATH GOUD
Krishna Pada Das – Appellant
Versus
Purnia Barman – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mrs. P. Dhar, Advocate, for the Petitioner; Mr. Samar Das, Advocate, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

1. This is an application under Section 19(iv) of the FAMILY COURTS ACT , 1984 against the Judgment and Order dated 24.01.2022 passed by the Learned Family Court, West Tripura, Agartala in Case No. Crl.Misc. 95 of 2020.

2. It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner and the respondent were married to each other in the year 2016 following Hindu rites and customs and they were blessed with a male child Master Satyadipon Das on 04.09.2017.

3. It is further submitted that the petitioner filed the petition for Divorce which was registered as TS(DIV) 165 of 2019 and the respondent also had filed a petition under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C. seeking maintenance for their son Master Satyodipon Das which was registered Crl.Misc 95 of 2020.

4. It is also submitted that the petitioner and the respondent having been staying separately since 04.09.2018 and that the petitioner has been regularly sending money for the upkeep of his son by money order. They petitioner also has been paying the interim maintenance regularly.

5. It is further submitted that after competition of evidence in Crl.Misc. 95 of 2020 and hearing was complete, the Ld Judge of the Family Court by Judgment dated 2

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top