SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Tri) 411

HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA
T. Amarnath Goud, J.
Krishna Pada Das - Appellant
Versus
Purnia Barman - Respondent
Crl. Rev. P. 8 of 2022
Decided On : 03-06-2022

Advocates appeared:
Mrs. P. Dhar, Advocate, for the Petitioner; Mr. Samar Das, Advocate, for the Respondent

Parents have a primary duty to financially support their children, prioritizing child welfare over other familial obligations.

Headnote:(A) Family Courts Act, 1984 - Section 19(iv) - Revision application against Family Court’s judgment regarding maintenance for minor child - Maintenance set at Rs.20,000 per month, subsequently modified to Rs.10,000 with annual increments of 20%. (Paras 1-21)

(B) Maintenance - Obligation of parents - Both parents have a duty to ensure the welfare and upbringing of their child, with the minor's needs prioritized over adult obligations and social commitments. (Paras 15-20)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner and respondent were married in 2016 and have a son born in 2017; petitioner filed for divorce while the respondent sought maintenance, alleging irregular payments without set amounts.

Findings of Court:
The Family Court initially ordered Rs.20,000 monthly for the child, which was considered high by the petitioner; the High Court modified it to Rs.10,000 with a 20% annual increase.

Issues: Whether the petitioner can maintain the ordered amount, and if the prescribed amount is justified based on the parties' financial responsibilities.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the importance of securing a stable upbringing for the child, indicating that parental obligations must take precedence over other family duties.

Result: Revision application allowed in part.

JUDGMENT

1. This is an application under Section 19(iv) of the FAMILY COURTS ACT , 1984 against the Judgment and Order dated 24.01.2022 passed by the Learned Family Court, West Tripura, Agartala in Case No. Crl.Misc. 95 of 2020.

2. It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner and the respondent were married to each other in the year 2016 following Hindu rites and customs and they were blessed with a male child Master Satyadipon Das on 04.09.2017.

3. It is further submitted that the petitioner filed the petition for Divorce which was registered as TS(DIV) 165 of 2019 and the respondent also had filed a petition under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C. seeking maintenance for their son Master Satyodipon Das which was registered Crl.Misc 95 of 2020.

4. It is also submitted that the petitioner and the respondent having been staying separately since 04.09.2018 and that the petitioner has been regularly sending money for the upkeep of his son by money order. They petitioner also has been paying the interim maintenance regularly.

5. It is further submitted that after competition of evidence in Crl.Misc. 95 of 2020 and hearing was complete, the Ld Judge of the Family Court by Judgment dated 24.01.2022 disposed of the petition for maintenance vide No. Crl.Misc 95 of 2020 with a direction upon the petitioner herein to pay a sum of Rs.20,000/- per month as maintenance for his minor son Master Satyadipon Das w.e.f. 01.01.2022.

6. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied by the Judgment and Order dated 24.01.2022 passed by the Learned Judge, Family Court, West Tripura in case No. Crl.Misc 95 of 2020 the petitioner herein prefers this revision application before this court.

7. For the sake of brevity the parties hereinafter are referred to as in the cause title of Crl.Misc 95 of 2020.

8. It is apparent from the records that the court below while dealing with case Crl.Misc 95 of 2020 set the following points for determination.

(i) Whether the petitioner is the legally married wife of the OP and out of their wedlock as son was born namely Master Satyadipon Das?

(ii) Whether the OP-husband having sufficient means neglects or refuses to maintain his son Master Satyadipon Das?

(iii) Whether the minor son is entitled to maintenance allowance from the OP and if so, up to what extent?

9. While dealing with the point no.(i) the court below observed that marriage is not disputed by either party and also the birth of the son Satyadipn Das out of the wedlock the petitioner and the OP. All the witnesses of the petitioner and the OP have also corroborated the fact of marriage of the petitioner and the OP and their son Satyadipon out of their wedlock. Therefore, admitted fact need not be proved.

10. Point No. II and III were taken together for brevity. From the deposition of witnesses, it was observed by the court below that Smt Purnima Barman in her deposition as PW-1 specifically deposed that she has filed the instant maintenance case for her minor son Master Satyadipon Das aged about 4 years who is residing with her and the OP used to pay maintenance @ Rs.2000 per month by post but she was on her work, she could not receive the said money. Howsoever, some arrangement were made for payment but subsequently, the payment became irregular and the OP stopped paying any maintenance for which she has been facing problem to maintain her son alone by her income. She said she is a Govt. Teacher on a fixed scale and it is difficult for her to maintain herself and her son with her salary for which she filed a case for interim maintenance before the Court claiming maintenance for her son R@ Rs.30,000/- per month for his maintenance as well as education expense. She said that her husband is Manager at TSECL and is monthly salary is about Rs.80,000/-.

11. In her cross examination, she admitted that the OP has been paying maintenance as and when required and she has informed the OP about the admission of her son in Bharatiya Vidyabhaban who is studying in Preparatory - I.

12. On the other

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top