SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Tri) 150

ARINDAM LODH
Asish Kanti Saha – Appellant
Versus
State of Tripura – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Ms. A. Debbarma, Advocate, for the Petitioner; Mr. Kohinoor N Bhattacharyya, Mr. K. C. Bhattacharjee, Advocate, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

1. Since common questions of law and facts are involved, all the writ petitions are taken up together for disposal at the admission stage itself by this common judgment on the consent of learned counsels appearing for the parties.

2. In all the writ petitions the petitioners have prayed for a direction from this court upon the respondents to cause full and final payment of gratuity to the petitioners after adjusting the partial payment already made to them. They have also prayed to direct the respondents to give interest @ 9% per annum on the amount that has been already paid to them. The petitioners were working under the respondent nos. 3 and 4, and on attaining the age of superannuation they have retired on different dates. Necessary particulars in respect of their dates of retirement and claims are mentioned in the table below:

Sl. No.

Name of the petitioner in connected writ petition

Date of retirement

Entitled amount of gratuity

1.

Sri Ashish Kanti Saha, WP(C) No. 544 of 2022

30.09.2021

Rs. 20,13,327/-

2.

Sri Nikhil Das, WP(C) 545 of 2022

31.08.2021

Rs. 15,50,050/-

3.

Sri Nirode Debbarma, WP(C) 546 of 2022

31.10.2021

Rs. 16,44,593/-

3. Ms. A. Deb

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top