SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Tri) 368

ARINDAM LODH
Mallika Rema – Appellant
Versus
Tripura Road Transport Corporation – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks writ for gratuity payment and interest. (Para 2)
2. gratuity amount and interest entitlements established. (Para 3 , 4)
3. court directives for payment of gratuity and interest. (Para 5)
4. writ petition allowed and disposed. (Para 6)

JUDGMENT

Arindam Lodh, J. - Heard Mr. P. Roy Barman, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. K. Nath, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. D. Bhattacharya, learned GA assisted by Ms. S. Nag, learned counsel appearing for the State-respondents and Mr. K. C. Bhattacharya, learned counsel appearing for the respondent-TRTC.

2. By means of filing the present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:

'(i) Issue Rule upon the Respondents to show cause as to why writ in the nature of Mandamus and/or order/orders and/or direction/directions of like nature shall not be issued whereby directing the Respondents to make the full and final payment of Gratuity with interest @ 9% per annum to the Petitioner, w.e.f. the date on which gratuity became payable till date of payment.

(ii) Issue Rule upon the Respondents to show cause as to why writ in the nature of Mandamus and/or order/orders and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top