SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Tri) 369

ARINDAM LODH
Anil Debbarma – Appellant
Versus
State of Tripura – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petitioner's request for gratuity payment. (Para 1)
2. enhanced gratuity limit applicability. (Para 2)
3. entitlement to recalculated gratuity with interest. (Para 3)
4. writ petition allowed and disposed. (Para 4)

JUDGMENT

Arindam Lodh, J. - Heard Mr. P. Roy Barman, learned Sr. counsel assisted by Mr. K. Nath, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. K. De, learned counsel appearing for the State-respondents and Mr. B. Shome Bhowmik, learned counsel appearing for the respondent Nos. 3 and 4.

1. By means of filing the present petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:

'(i) Issue Rule upon the Respondents to show cause as to why a writ in the nature of Mandamus and/or order/orders and/or direction/directions of like nature shall not be issued whereby directing the Respondents to make full and final payment of Gratuity (Rs.3,55,365/-) with interest @ 9% p.a. to the petitioner, w.e.f. the date on which the gratuity becomes payable till the date of payment after adjusting lump sum amount of Rs.10,00,000/-.

(ii) Issue Rule upon the Respondents to show cause as to why a writ in the nature of Mandamus and/or order/orders and/or direction/

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top