SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Tri) 7

T. AMARNATH GOUD, ARINDAM LODH
Pradip Chandra Das – Appellant
Versus
Soma Das – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
A. Debbarma, Advocate, for the Appellant; S. Bhattacharjee, Advocate, for the Respondents

JUDGMENT

T. Amarnath Goud, J. - This Appeal has been filed under Section 28 of the HINDU MARRIAGE ACT , 1955 read with Section 19(1) of the FAMILY COURTS ACT , 1984, against the Judgment and Decree, dated 29.05.2019 passed by the learned District Judge, North Tripura, Dharmanagar in Case No. T.S. (Divorce) 27 of 2017.

2. The facts of the case in brief as stated in the pliant are that the appellant and the respondent were legally married husband and wife. The marriage between the appellant-husband and the respondent-wife took place on 14.03.1999, according to Hindu rites, rituals, and customs in the house of the parents of the respondent, situated at Uptakhali, Panisagar, North Tripura. The appellant-husband and respondent-wife are Hindu by religion and as such, they are governed by the HINDU MARRIAGE ACT , 1955.

3. The marriage of the appellant and the respondent were duly consummated and out to their wedlock one daughter was born to them on 15.03.2002.

4. The appellant is a Post Graduate Teacher and at present, he is posted at Pratyekroy H.S. School, Dharmanagar. The Appellant is drawing a monthly salary of Rs. 68,575/-.

5. The appellant-husband as petitioner filed a petition under Se

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top