SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Tri) 11

APARESH KUMAR SINGH
Kandarpa Narayan Paul – Appellant
Versus
Sudip Datta – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Sankar Lodh, Advocate, for the Appellant.

JUDGMENT AND ORDER(ORAL)

1. Proof of notice through paper publication has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner on 12.12.2023. The date of appearance of the respondent was 13.12.2023 but the respondent has not entered appearance despite valid service of notice.

Heard Mr. Sankar Lodh, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.

2. The present revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India arises out of the order dated 12.12.2022 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Khowai in case No. Title Suit 04 of 2020 whereby the learned trial Court has rejected the petition filed by the plaintiff/petitioner for correction of the judgment and decree dated 09.09.2022.

3. The plaintiff/petitioner had preferred T.S. No.04 of 2020 for the following reliefs:

"(i) Pass a decree directing the defendant to perform her part of obligation by executing the registration of the sale deed for the land, mentioned in the Schedule below.

(ii) In the event of non-compliance of the decree by the defendant, the Ld. Court would be pleased to execute the registration of the sale deed so presented in respect of the suit land in favour of the plaintiff on behalf of the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top