SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(AP) 1414

RAVI NATH TILHARI
K. V. Srinivasulu Naidu – Appellant
Versus
V. Bhaskar – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
S.Lakshminarayana Reddy, Advocate, M.Rahul, Advocate

JUDGMENT

RAVI NATH TILHARI,J. - Heard Sri S. Lakshminarayana Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners/Judgment Debtors (J.Drs.) and Sri M. Rahul, learned counsel for the respondent/Decree Holder (D.Hr.).

2. The present civil revision petition under Sec. 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure (in short "CPC") is filed by the defendants/J.Drs. against the plaintiff/D.Hr. challenging the order of the Additional Senior Civil Judge, Chittoor, dtd. 13/6/2023 passed in E.A.No.44 of 2015 in E.P.No.51 of 2012 for execution of the decree dtd. 7/2/2011 passed in O.S.No.24 of 2001.

3. The plaintiff/D.Hr. filed O.S.No.24 of 2001 against the defendants/J.Drs. for specific performance of contract which was decreed on 7/2/2011 for the plaint schedule properties.

4. In execution of that decree in E.P.No.51 of 2012, the Execution Court executed the sale deed on 23/2/2015 on behalf of the defendants/J.Drs and the same was also registered.

5. The D.Hr. filed E.A.No.44 of 2015 for delivery of possession of the E.P.schedule property basing on the registered sale deed. This application was filed mentioning under Order XXI Rule 95 CPC.

6. The defendants/J.Drs. filed objections taking the plea that the posses

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top