Back
RAVI NATH TILHARI
K. V. Srinivasulu Naidu – Appellant
Versus
V. Bhaskar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. civil revision petition detailing procedural facts. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. court observed the necessity of possession claim. (Para 10 , 16) |
| 3. arguments by judgment debtors on possession delivery. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. analysis of the implications of the decree. (Para 18 , 21) |
| 5. conclusion on execution order for possession upheld. (Para 62 , 63 , 64) |
JUDGMENT
RAVI NATH TILHARI,J. - Heard Sri S. Lakshminarayana Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners/Judgment Debtors (J.Drs.) and Sri M. Rahul, learned counsel for the respondent/Decree Holder (D.Hr.).
2. The present civil revision petition under Sec. 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure (in short "CPC") is filed by the defendants/J.Drs. against the plaintiff/D.Hr. challenging the order of the Additional Senior Civil Judge, Chittoor, dtd. 13/6/2023 passed in E.A.No.44 of 2015 in E.P.No.51 of 2012 for execution of the decree dtd. 7/2/2011 passed in O.S.No.24 of 2001.
3. The plaintiff/D.Hr. filed O.S.No.24 of 2001 against the defendants/J.Drs. for specific performance of contract which was decreed on 7/2/2011 for the plaint schedule properties.
4. In execution of that decree in E.P.No.51 of 2012, the Execution C
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
