Back
APARESH KUMAR SINGH, ARINDAM LODH
Ashes Deb – Appellant
Versus
State of Tripura – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. jurisdiction issues under arbitration act (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. details of disputed contracts (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. awards issued by arbitrator and case number references (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. condonation of delay issues raised (Para 8) |
| 5. court's decision analysis on jurisdiction (Para 9 , 27) |
| 6. arguments on limitation calculations (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 7. statutory jurisdiction competency arguments (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 8. claims on delay explanations and counter-arguments (Para 18 , 19) |
| 9. arguments surrounding the appropriateness of the commercial court's actions. (Para 20 , 24) |
| 10. interpretation of effective dates for limitation (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 11. final ruling on limitation highlights adherence to statutory timely applications. (Para 39) |
| 12. final ruling on limitation adherence and implications (Para 40 , 41 , 42 , 46) |
JUDGMENT & ORDER (ORAL)
Aparesh Kumar Singh, CJ. - The primary question involved in these two appeals is whether an application under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as amended (for short, the Act) before the learned Commercial Court, West Tripura, Agartala was barred by the delay being beyond the period of three months and th
The limitation period for an application under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act cannot be extended beyond specified timelines, maintaining strict adherence to legal provisions.
Delay beyond 120 days (90+30) in Section 34 petitions or corresponding appeals under Section 37 of Arbitration Act not condonable via Limitation Act Section 5; negligence, inaction, lack of bonafides....
The period for challenging an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act cannot be extended beyond the prescribed period, as the Act is a self-contained special law and t....
The interpretation of 'three months' in Section 34(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, is clarified to mean three calendar months, not strictly 90 days.
Point of Law : Even if the period of delay is considered to be of 21 days. Since Section 34(3) of the Act, 1996 bars condonation of delay beyond the period of 30 days after the period of 3 months is ....
The court upheld limitations on condonation applications under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, emphasizing adherence to statutory timelines.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
