Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AT AGARTALA
T. AMARNATH GOUD, J.
The State of Tripura - Appellant
Versus
Binoy Debbarma - Respondent
Crl. Appeal No. 10 of 2022
Decided On : 24-07-2023
ORDER :
1. This matter has been listed before this Court today in the Column of “To Be Spoken To” for correction of the Judgment and Order dated 19.07.2023, wherein on page No.1 in the second line, it is typed as ‘Section (1)(b)’ the same would be read as ‘Section 378(1)(b)’. In the last line of page-No.1, it is typed as ‘Section (B)(I)’ the same would be read as ‘Section 376(B)(i)’ and on page-2 (para-3) in the 2nd line, it is typed as ‘Jatrapur P.S. Case No.2019JTTP037’, the same would be read as ‘Jatrapur P.S. Case No.2019JTP037’.
2. Accordingly, the same is ordered.
3. This order shall form part of the Judgment and order dated 19.07.2023 passed in this present appeal.
The court has the authority to correct typographical errors in orders to rectify mistakes.
Judicial correction of judgments is essential to maintain clarity and accuracy in legal records.
The court affirmed the principle that clerical errors in judgments can be corrected to maintain the integrity and accuracy of judicial orders.
Courts possess the inherent authority to rectify clerical or transcription errors in their judicial orders to ensure accuracy and procedural consistency within official records.
The judgment clarifies the correction of a clerical error in a previous court order.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
