Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH BENCH AT GWALIOR
Sunita Yadav, J.
Mewaram Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No. 59565 of 2022
Decided On : 15-12-2022
typographical error - correction of order - The court allowed the correction of a typographical error in the cause title of the order dated 06.12.2022 passed in M.Cr.C. No. 57444/2022, from 'District Mandsaur' to 'District Bhind'.
Fact of the Case:
The petition was filed for the correction of a typographical error in the order dated 06.12.2022 passed in M.Cr.C. No. 57444/2022.
Finding of the Court:
The court allowed the petition and directed the correction of the typographical error in the cause title of the order.
Issues:
Ratio Decidendi: The court found that there was a typographical mistake in the cause title of the order and allowed the correction to rectify the error.
Final Decision: The petition was allowed, and the correction in the cause title of the order was directed.
JUDGMENT
Sunita Yadav, J. - This petition under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C has been filed for correction of typographical error crept in the order dated 06.12.2022 passed in M.Cr.C. No. 57444/2022.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that application under section 438 of Cr.P.C. was allowed by this Court vide order dated 06.12.2022 passed in M.Cr.C. No.57444/2022, but due to typographical error in the cause title of order instead of "District Bhind" it has been wrongly mentioned as "District Mandsaur". Hence prayed for correction in the order.
3. In view of aforesaid and perusal of the record, it appears that in the order dated 06.12.2022 passed in M.Cr.C. No. 57444/2022 due to typographical mistake instead of "District Bhind" it has been wrongly mentioned as "District Mandsaur".
4. Accordingly, this petition is allowed and it is directed that in place of "District Mandsaur" it be read as "District Bhind". The rest of order dated 06.12.2022 passed in M.Cr.C. No. 57444/2022 shall be kept intact.
5. This order shall be read in conjunction with the order dated 06.12.2022 passed in M.Cr.C. No. 57444/2022. A copy of this order passed today be kept in the record of M.Cr.C. No. 57444/2022.
6. M.Cr.C. stands disposed of.
7. Certified copy as per rules.
The court has the authority to correct typographical errors in orders to rectify mistakes.
The court has the discretion to allow modification to correct typographical errors in orders.
The court has the authority to correct clerical errors in judgments/orders to ensure accuracy and precision.
The court affirmed the principle that clerical errors in judgments can be corrected to maintain the integrity and accuracy of judicial orders.
The court established that clerical errors in judicial orders can be corrected to uphold the accuracy and integrity of legal documents.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
