T.NANDAKUMAR SINGH
CMJ Foundation, through its Trustee Indu Rani Jha – Appellant
Versus
State of Meghalaya through its Chief Secretary – Respondent
Heard Mr. A Kumar, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. R Jha, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. KS Kynjing, learned Advocate General assisted by Mr. K Khan, learned Addl. Sr. GA appearing for the respondents.
2. The Meghalaya Legislative Assembly enacted the CMJ University Act, 2009 (Act. No.4 of 2009) to establish and incorporate an University in the State, with emphasis on providing high quality and industry-relevant education in the areas of Physical Sciences, Life Sciences, Technology, Medical Science and Paramedical, Management, Finance & Accounting, Commerce, Humanities, Languages & Communication, Applied and Performing Arts, Education, Law, Social Science and related areas sponsored by CMJ Foundation and to provide for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. As the questions call for decision in the present writ petition are to be decided taking into consideration of the provisions of the CMJ University Act, 2009 (for short ‘the said Act of 2009’), it would be more profitable to reproduce the relevant Sections of the said Act of 2009. Acco
Ashok Kumar Das & Ors. v. University of Burdwan & Ors.
A.K. Kraipak v. Union of India
State of T.N. v. Arooran Sugars Ltd.
State of Gujarat v. Shantilal Mangaldas & Ors., (Constitution Bench)
State of NCT of Delhi & Anr. v. Sanjeev Alias Bittoo
Shekhar Ghosh v. Union of India & Anr.
H.L. Trehan & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
Haryana Financial Corporation & Anr. v. Jagdamba Oil Mills & Anr.
Hukum Chand Shyam Lal v. Union of India & Ors., (4 Judges)
Bhavnagar University v. Palitana Sugar Mill (P) Ltd. & Ors.
K.I. Shephard & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
Kusheshwar Prasad Singh v. State of Bihar & Ors.
Kalinga Mining Corporation v. Union of India & Ors.
Mrutunjay Pani v. Naramada Bala Sasmal
Narayan Govind Gavate & Ors. v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Life Insurance Corpn. of India v. Escorts Ltd.
Lord Krishna Textiles Mills Ltd. v. Workmen
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.