BISWANATH SOMADDER, H.S.THANGKHIEW
Jengme Sangma – Appellant
Versus
State of Meghalaya – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The two instant writ appeals are being taken up together for consideration; being similar in nature and arising out of a common judgment and order dated 10th September, 2012, passed by a learned Single Judge of the erstwhile jurisdictional High Court (i.e. the Gauhati High Court). Another writ appeal, being WA No. 6 of 2013, which had arisen from this same judgment and order i.e. 10th September, 2012, had been segregated earlier and taken up for consideration separately, by this Bench and disposed of by a judgment and order dated 01st April, 2021, since, on examination, it was discovered that the proceedings therein were neither wholly identical nor similar in nature with the present two writ appeals, i.e. WA No. 35 of 2012 and WA No. 36 of 2012.
2. Before proceeding to discuss the merits of the two appeals, it is pertinent to note that in the batch of three writ petitions, which were disposed of by a learned Single Judge by a common judgment and order dated 10th September, 2012; WP (C) No. 353 (SH) of 2009 was allowed and WP (C) No. 250 (SH) of 2009 and WP (C) No. 251 (SH) of 2009 were dismissed. The appeals arising from the two writ petitions which were dismissed are now
Arvind Singh vs. State of U.P. and Others
Babubhai Muljibhai Patel vs. Nandlal Khodidas Barot and Others
Bimal Kumar Ghosh vs. Kolkata Municipal Corporation
DLF Housing Construction (P) Ltd. vs. Delhi Municipal Corporation
Real Estate Agencies vs. State of Goa and Others
Satyadhyan Ghosal and Others vs. Smt. Deorajin Debi and Another
Smt. Gunwant Kaur vs. Municipal Committee, Bhatinda and Others
Sohan Lal vs. Union of India and Another
State of Bihar vs. Jain Plastics and Chemicals Ltd. (2002) 1 SCC 216
Suganmal vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and Others
Swati Ferro Alloys (P) Ltd. vs. Orissa Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation
Thansingh Nathmal and Others Superintendent of Taxes, Dhubri and Others
Encroachment of Land - Writ not maintainable as Disputed question of facts - To avail alternate available remedy.
The settlement claim must be substantiated with relevant documents in a summary proceeding.
Settlement of forest land is void without prior Central approval under the Forest (Conservation) Act; a jurisdictional error does not validate an illegal title.
The court affirmed that previous orders rejecting applications for scientific measurement in ongoing litigation are final and cannot be re-agitated, emphasizing the principles of res judicata and tim....
The right to sue accrues when there is a clear and unequivocal threat to infringe the right of the plaintiff. The Trial Court erred in holding the suit barred by limitation. The provisions of Section....
Possession alone does not confer entitlement to government land; prior rejections of settlement applications by the state are binding.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.