Back
W. DIENGDOH
Hunmon Rangad – Appellant
Versus
Surindra Kumar – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. For an alleged violation of the order of the Judge, District Council Court, Shillong dated 31.08.2020 and 05.07.2021 respectively passed in Succession Misc. Case No. 177 of 2019 by the respondent herein, the petitioner (since deceased) has approached this Court with this application under Sections 10 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
2. Bereft of unnecessary details, what can be understood is that the petitioner had applied for a Succession Certificate before the Court of the Judge, District Council Court, Shillong with regard to the debts and securities of her deceased son (Late) Colin Rangad which was registered as in Succession Misc. Case No. 177 of 2019.
3. The Court vide order dated 12.03.2020 in the said case has passed an order for grant of Succession Certificate to the petitioner and the respondent bank, (Bank of Baroda, Laitumkhrah Branch) in compliance thereto had disbursed Rs. 75,000/- (Rupees seventy-five thousand) only to the petitioner out of the account of (Late) Colin Rangad.
4. The petitioner was then informed that her deceased son also had a fixed deposit account being Account No. 850203311005178 in the said bank amounting to Rs. 13,00,000/- (Rup
The entitlement of a nominee under the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 and the effect of subsequent court orders on the enforcement of previous orders.
The absence of a legal mandate for probating the will and the wilful disobedience to court directions by the bank were the central legal points established in the judgment.
The court affirmed that a succession certificate grants legal heirs entitlement to deceased's bank deposits, overriding nominee claims under the Banking Regulation Act.
The court emphasized that contempt proceedings should only be initiated when there is a clear case of wilful disobedience of a court's order and that the respondents followed due process to extend cr....
The court highlighted the importance of establishing the elements of contempt and the need for explicit directions in the court order for considering contempt proceedings.
Legal heirs may not step into contempt proceedings post the death of the original petitioner, as the relief sought ceases.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
