SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Megh) 26

W. DIENGDOH
T. Pathaw – Appellant
Versus
Inspector of Police, CBI – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. S. Jindal, Advocate, for the Appellant; Dr. N. Mozika, DSGI with Ms. K. Gurung, Advocates, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT (ORAL)

1. This is an application under Section 482 preferred by the petitioner herein with a prayer to set aside and quash the FIR dated 10.12.2015 filed by the Head of Branch, CBI, ACB, Shillong and upon investigation, a consequent chargesheet dated 31.12.2016 being filed leading to the formal proceeding being CR Case No. 38(S) 2017 now pending before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Shillong with the petitioner herein as the sole accused.

2. Heard Mr. S. Jindal, learned counsel for the petitioner, who has submitted that the background facts and circumstances of the case of the petitioner is required to be placed before this Court to better understand the issues involved.

3. The learned counsel has then submitted that the petitioner herein is the Chairman of M/s Ranger Security and Service Organisation dealing mostly in the area of outsourcing of manpower to various organisation requiring such manpower.

4. North Eastern Indira Gandhi Regional Institute of Health and Medical Sciences (NEIGRIHMS) has floated tender for availing the services of outsource personnel at NEIGRIHMS, Shillong and the petitioner's Organisation being the successful bidder has thereafter entered in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top