IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL
M.V. Muralidaran, J.
Naorem Nena Devi & Anr. - Appellants
Versus
State Of Manipur & Ors. - Respondents
WP(C) No. 82 of 2022 with MC(WP(C)) No. 104 of 2022 with MC(WP(C)) No. 97 of 2022
Decided On : 16-06-2022
DPC - Promotion Dispute - BDS Course Regulations 2007, JNIMS Service Rule 2015 - The court discussed the eligibility criteria for promotion to the post of Associate Professor in the Department of PAEDIATRIC AND PREVENTIVE DENTISTRY, in Dental College, JNIMS as per the Dental Council of India BDS Course Regulations 2007 and JNIMS Service Rule 2015. The court found that the petitioners were not eligible for promotion to the post of Associate Professor and dismissed the writ petition.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners sought to quash the proposed DPC for promotion to the post of Associate Professor in the Department of PAEDIATRIC AND PREVENTIVE DENTISTRY, in Dental College, JNIMS, alleging favoritism towards a junior candidate. They claimed seniority over the private respondent and challenged the eligibility and experience of the private respondent.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioners were not eligible for promotion to the post of Associate Professor as per the BDS Course Regulations 2007 and JNIMS Service Rule 2015. It also determined that the private respondent's experience certificate was genuine and dismissed the writ petition.
Issues: The main issues were the eligibility of the petitioners for promotion and the authenticity of the private respondent's experience certificate.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the petitioners' lack of eligibility for promotion precluded them from challenging the DPC proceeding. It also found that the private respondent's experience certificate was genuine, and therefore, the petitioners' challenge was dismissed.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the writ petition, vacated the interim order, and merged all pending cases with the judgment.
JUDGMENT
1. Heard Mr. H. S. Paonam, learned Senior counsel for the Petitioners, Mr. S. Nepolean Singh, Learned GA for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2, Mr. Juno Rahman, learned counsel for the Respondent No. 3, Mr. A. Jagjit Singh, Learned counsel for the Respondent Nos. 4 and 5, and Mr. I. Lalitkumar, learned senior counsel for the Private Respondent No.6.
2. In the instant writ Petition, the Petitioners are praying for quashing and setting aside the impugned proposed DPC for promotion to the post of Associate Professor in the Department of PAEDIATRIC AND PREVENTIVE DENTISTRY, in Dental College, JNIMS as a continuation of the Dental Council of India's Letter dated 30-12-2021 and further direction to consider the case of the Petitioners prior to the Private Respondent for promotion to the next higher post of Associate Professor in Dental College, JNIMS as and when they become eligible and there are vacant post available. The Petitioners have also prayed for passing an appropriate interim order for restraining the JNIMS authority from holding the DPC for promotion to the post of Associate Professor in the Department of PAEDIATRJC AND PREVENTIVE DENTISTRY, in Dental College, JNIMS during the pendency of the present case.
3. Mr. H.S Paonam, the learned senior for the petitioner submitted that according to the Petitioners, the JNIM, Porompat issued Notification dated 17-4-2018 inviting application for appointment of 18 (eighteen) Assistant Professors in Dental College, JNIMS for various Department including the Department of PAEDIATRIC AND PREVENTIVE DENTISTRY, Dental College, JNIMS, Porompat.
4. Consequent upon the recommendation of a duly constituted Selection Board, the present Petitioner No. 1 and the Petitioner No. 2 were appointed as Assistant Professor in the Department of PAEDIATRIC AND PREVENTIVE DENTISTRY, Dental College, JNIMS vide Order dated 14-8-2018. The Petitioner No 1 is at Serial No. 10 and the Petitioner No 2 is at Serial No. 11 in the list of All the Assistant professor and the Department of PAEDIATRIC AND PREVENTIVE DENTISTRY, Department of Dental College, JNIMS, the Petitioner No. 1 is at Serial No. 1 and the Petitioner No. 2 is at Serial No. 2 in order of merits.
5. He further represented that the Private Respondent was appointed as Assistant Professor in the Department of PAEDIATRIC AND PREVENTIVE DENTISTRY, Dental College, JNIMS vide Order dated 29-9-2019 and the Private Respondent is at Serial No. 3 of the list of Assistant Professor in the Department of PAEDIATRIC AND PREVENTIVE DENTISTRY, Dental College, JNIMS. In other words, the Petitioners are senior to the Private Respondent amongst the Assistant professors for the Department of PAEDIATRIC AND PREVENTIVE DENTISTRY in Dental College, JNIMS.
6. It is further case of the petitioners are that the next promotional post for the post of Assistant Professor is the Associate Professor. The Dental College, JNIMS being a nascent College and therefore, a lot of development work in terms of faculty, infrastructure and documentation is going on. A separate Recruitment Rules for promotion to the post of Associate Professor is yet to be framed. However, it is learned that the JNIMS authority have taken up process for filling up various teaching posts by way of promotion and perhaps for avoiding any complicacies have sought clarification from the Dental Council of India regarding qualification of the faculty. The Dental Council of India vide Letter dated 30-12-2021 have clarified in terms of the following:
'The Director, Jawaharlal Nehru Institute of Medical Sciences. Imphal be requested to follow BDS Course Regulations 2007 minimum basic Qualification and Teaching Experience. Besides the Service Rules for teachers prescribed by the Medical Education Department of the respective State may be followed.'
7. The Dental Council of India, BDS Course Regulations 2007 would regulate the Dental Colleges in India prescribing the minimum Basic Qualification and Teaching Experience Require
State of Orissa and others -Vs- MESCO Steels Limited and another
Ulagappa and others -Vs- Divisional Commissioner, Mysore and others
The main legal point established in the judgment is that eligibility criteria for promotion, as per the applicable regulations, must be met, and the court does not have the power to relax or override....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the experience of guiding research at the doctoral level was enough for time bound promotion, and it was not necessary for the research schola....
Reserved category post with pending direct recruitment requisition cannot be filled by promotion; inadvertent process withdrawn correctly. Court mandates finalizing Recruitment & Promotion Rules befo....
The main legal principle established in the judgment is the importance of parity in promotions and the application of Rule 35 of the Rules of 1962 to allow for relaxation of rules in exceptional case....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the experience of a Professor includes the experience of an Additional Professor as per the guidelines prescribed by the Medical Council of In....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.