AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH
Tayenjam Biju Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Manipur – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. Heard Mr. Th. Ibohal, learned senior advocate and Mr. Th. Mahira, learned advocate appearing for the petitioners. Heard also Mr. Lenin Hijam, learned Advocate General (AG), Manipur, appearing for the respondents.
The present two writ petitions have been filed with a prayer for quashing the order dated 08.01.2001 passed by the Deputy Commissioner (D.C), Imphal East, in Rev. Misc. Case No. 4 of 2020 and also the order dated 15.01.2021, passed by the Deputy Commissioner, Imphal East, in Eviction Case No. 1 of 2021. Since the facts and law involved in the two writ petitions are identical, the present two writ petitions are heard jointly and the same are being disposed of by this common judgment and order.
2. The facts of the present cases in a nutshell is that the petitioner in W.P.(C) No. 42 of 2021 and the petitioner in W.P.(C) No. 46 of 2021 claim that they are the owners and recorded pattadars of the homestead land under Patta No. 238 (Old), 438 (New) of C.S. Dag No. 309, 310, 311/812 having an area of 0.28 acre of Village No. 5/Khabam and of the homestead land under Patta No. 115 (Old), 439/910 (New) of C.S. Dag No. 313/1130 having an area of 0.08 acre of Village No. 5/Kh
Dharampal Satyapal Ltd. vs. Deputy Commissioner and Central Excise
N. Mani vs. Sangeetha Theatre And Others reported in (2004) 12 SCC 278
Phoenix ARC Private Limited vs. Vishwa Bharati Vidya Mandir and Others reported in AIR 2022 SC 1045
PK. Palanisamy vs. N. Arumugham & Another reported in (2009) 9 SCC 173
The Deputy Commissioner's actions were found to be in compliance with the MLR & LR Act and Rules, and substantial compliance with the principles of natural justice. The court declined to interfere wi....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the cancellation of a mutation must adhere to the principles of natural justice and statutory provisions, and the authority reviewing the muta....
The State Government does not have the power to review its own orders unless such power is specifically conferred by statute. The State Government cannot exercise its power of review after a long del....
The Deputy Collector's notice issued beyond the one-year limit for calling records under the Tenancy Act was void, emphasizing the necessity of application of mind in such proceedings.
The judgment emphasizes the importance of adhering to principles of natural justice and providing a reasonable opportunity for the parties to present their case.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.