AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH
Telem Jayanta Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Manipur – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. Heard Mr. P. Tomcha, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Mr. Lenin Hijam, learned Advocate General, Manipur appearing for the respondents.
The present two writ petitions have been filed with a prayer for quashing the order dated 15.01.2021 passed by the Deputy Commissioner, Imphal East, in Eviction Case No. 1 of 2021. Since the facts and law involved in the two writ petitions are the same, the present two writ petitions are heard jointly and the same are being disposed of by this common judgment and order.
2. The brief facts of the present case is that the petitioner in W.P.(C) No. 74 of 2021 and the petitioner in W.P.(C) No. 76 of 2021 claimed that they are the owners and recorded Pattadars of the homestead land under Old Patta No. 238 (Part), 1251/1268 (New) covered by C.S. Dag No. 853/1498 measuring an area of 0.0425 acres of Village No. 5-Khabam and the homestead land under Old Patta No. 238 (Part), 1251/1268 (New) covered by C.S. Dag No. 853/1498 measuring an area of 0.0425 acres of Village No. 5-Khabam respectively.
3. It is the case of the petitioners that they are in physical possession of the said land by constructing wooden structures and carrying on
Dharampal Satyapal Ltd. vs. Deputy Commissioner and Central Excise
N. Mani vs. Sangeetha Theatre And Others reported in (2004) 12 SCC 278
Phoenix ARC Private Limited vs. Vishwa Bharati Vidya Mandir and Others reported in AIR 2022 SC 1045
PK. Palanisamy vs. N. Arumugham & Another reported in (2009) 9 SCC 173
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.