KH. NOBIN SINGH
Letkhomang Khongsai – Appellant
Versus
State of Manipur – Respondent
JUDGMENT
[1] Heard Shri Ajoy Pebam, learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner Shri N. Kumarjit, learned AG, Manipur appearing for the State respondents and Shri N. Ibotombi, learned Senior Advocate appearing for the private respondent.
[2] By the instant writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for issuing a writ of quo warranto to declare the appointment/ extension of service of the private respondent to the post of OSD as well as Ex-Officio Chief Engineer, Water Resources Department, Manipur as illegal and unconstitutional and consequently, to quash the order dated 02/02/2018 issued by the Under Secretary (WR), Government of Manipur order dated 23/07/2018 issued by the Commissioner (WR), Government of Manipur and order dated 11/01/2019 issued by the Secretary (WR), Government of Manipur and also to direct the State respondents to cancel the said orders.
[3.1] Facts and circumstances as narrated in the writ petition, are that the petitioner is a Village Chief of S. Bongjang Village and that the instant writ petition is being filed by him after making a thorough inquiry and collecting relevant materials.
[3.2] In respect of the appointment of the Chief Engineers of all Engineering
B. Srinivasa Reddy Vs. Karnataka Urban Water Supply and Drainage Board Employees Assn. and ors.
B.R. Kapur Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and anr.
Brij Mohan Lal Vs. Union of India and ors.
Central Electricity Supply Utility of Udisha Vs. Dhobei Chandra Jena and ors.
Centre for PIL and anr. Vs. Union of India and anr.
Centre for Public Interest Litigation Vs. Union of India and ors
Dilip Kumar Garg and anr. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and ors
Ekta Shakti Foundation Vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
Haribansh Lal Vs. Sahodar Prasad Mahto and ors.
Parisons Agrotech Private Ltd and anr. Vs. Union of India and ors
State through CBI/ New Delhi Vs. S.J. Choudhury
State of Uttar Pradesh and ors. Vs. Chaudhary Ran Beer Singh and anr.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.