IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL
M.V. Muralidaran, A.C.J., A. Guneshwar Sharma, J.
Smt. Surinder Kaur – Petitioner
Versus
The Union of India, through the Secretary, Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi and ors. – Respondents
Writ Appeal No. 86 of 2016 Ref:- W.P.(C) No. 1401 of 2005
Decided On : 05-10-2023
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of nishan singh's death (Para 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments by the appellant and respondents (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 3. court's observations on evidence and previous proceedings (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 4. analysis of procedural flaws and need for investigation (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50) |
| 5. legal grounds for directing cbi investigation (Para 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64) |
| 6. final order directing cbi investigation (Para 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75) |
JUDGMENT :
M.V. Muralidaran, A.C.J.
Heard Mr. Kh. Chonjon, learned senior counsel for the appellant; Mr. S. Samarjeet, learned Senior Panel Counsel for Central Government for the respondent Union of India and Mr.R.K.Umakanta, learned Government Advocate for the respondent State.
2. This writ appeal is filed against the judgment and order of the learned Single Judge dated 18.7.2016 made in W.P.(C) No.1401 of 2016.
3. The appellant is the writ petitioner. She filed the writ petition for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the State respondents to conduct/hold an enquiry through the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) regarding the death of her son Nishan Singh on 19.11.2022 at the Camp of Battalion at Heavy Fuel Power Project, Leimakhong, Senapati District, Manipur. The learned Single Judge dismissed the writ petition. Challenging the same, the appellant has filed the present writ appeal.
4. Brief facts which led to the filing of the writ petition are as follows:
The appellant’s son Nishan Singh joined the 26th Bn., CRPF on 19.4.2000 as Constable and was posted at different places from time to time and, at the time when he died on 19.11.2002, he was posted at the Bn., H.Q., D. Company near the Heavy Fuel Power Project, Leimakhong, Shri P.K.Sahu and Shri Dinesh Kumar were the Company Commander and the Commandant of 26th Bn. respectively. Shri Dinesh Kumar used to come to the D. Company very often and one day prior to the death of Nishan Singh, he came to the D. Company and started staying at the residence of Shri P.K.Sahu when the latter stayed away from his room. The Quarter Master of the D. Company Joginder Singh asked Nishan Singh to put a chair inside the room where Shri Dinesh Kumar was staying and when Nishan Singh picked up the chair and went inside the room to place it there, he saw Shri Dinesh Kumar and the wife of Shri P.K.Sahu in an objectionable condition. When Nishan Singh spread the news about the illicit relation, both Shri Dinesh Kumar and Shri P.K.Sahu planned to murder Nishan Singh.
4.1. Accordingly, on 18.11.2022, Shri P.K.Sahu issued a night pass to Nishan Singh telling him to report in the Unit in the morning and on the next day when he presented himself in the Unit at about 7.15 a.m., Havildar Major Ramdarsh Parshad reported to the Company Commander who ordered that Nishan Singh be produced before him in uniform. When Nishan Singh presented himself, the Company Commander and Havildar Major Ramdarsh Parshad who were in civil dress, were sitting outside the office having a table before them. Shri P.K.Sahu who forcibly snatched the night pass from Nishan Singh, tore it off and told Nishan Singh that he had remained outside for the whole night without his order and since he had violated the law, he would be punished.
4.2. It is stated that Nishan Singh was made to stand as a punishment continuously from 8.22 a.m. to 11.35 a.m. torturing him both physically and mentally under a pre-planned conspiracy amongst his superior officers and during the interrogation, Shri P.K.Sahu asked Nishan Singh as to why he went to the room where and when Commandant Shri Dinesh Kumar and wife of Company Commander were sitting and then why did he announce the same to the public and, therefore, Shri P.K.Sahu told him that he did not want to see him alive. Nishan Singh replied
Assam Sanmilita Mahasangha and others v. Union of India and others
Dharam Pal v. State of Haryana and others
K.V.Rajendran v. Superintendent of Police, CBCID South Zone, Chennai
Kapila Hingorani v. State of Bihar
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India
Nilabati Behera v. State of Orissa
Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corpn. (1985) 3 SCC 545
Ramachandra Shankar Dodhar v. State of Maharashtra
S.N.Sharma v. Bipen Kumar Tiwari
Tilokchand Motichand v. H.B.Munshi
The court held a CBI investigation warranted due to significant suspicions surrounding the death of a constable, implicating senior officers in possible misconduct.
Crime investigation – Suspicious death of wife of Judicial Officer – Power to direct CBI to conduct investigation is to be exercised sparingly and such orders should not be passed in routine manner –....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's power to direct investigation by the CBI in cases involving serious crimes, high profile officials, and political nature of the crime, ....
Judicial intervention in criminal investigations is warranted to ensure fair process and public trust when local authorities are ineffective or biased.
The judgment emphasizes the constitutional right to a fair and just investigation, the duty of the police to act according to law, and the need for a balanced approach between individual rights and s....
It is trite law that Article 21 embraces both the life and liberty of the accused as well as the interest of the victim, his or her near and dear ones, as well as of the community at large.
Transfer of investigation to CBI requires exceptional circumstances; mere allegations against local police are insufficient for such action.
It is no more res integra that exercise of power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash a criminal proceeding is only when an allegation made in the FIR or the charge-sheet constitutes the ingredients of....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.