K. G. BALAKRISHNAN, R. V. RAVEENDRAN, D. K. JAIN, P. SATHASIVAM, J. M. PANCHAL
State of West Bengal – Appellant
Versus
Committee For Protection of Democratic Rights, West Bengal – Respondent
The paragraph that states that a High Court, in exercise of its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution, can issue directions only within its territorial jurisdiction is paragraph (!) .
JUDGMENT
D.K. Jain, J.:
1. The issue which has been referred for the opinion of the Constitution Bench is whether the High Court, in exercise of its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, can direct the Central Bureau of Investigation (for short “the CBI”), established under the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 (for short “the Special Police Act”), to investigate a cognizable offence, which is alleged to have taken place within the territorial jurisdiction of a State, without the consent of the State Government.
2. For the determination of the afore-stated important legal issue, it is unnecessary to dilate on the facts obtaining in individual cases in this bunch of civil appeals/special leave petitions/writ petitions and a brief reference to the facts in Civil Appeal Nos.6249- 6250 of 2001, noticed in the referral order dated 8th November, 2006, would suffice. These are:
One Abdul Rahaman Mondal (hereinafter referred to as, “the complainant”) along with a large number of workers of a political party had been staying in several camps of that party at Garbeta, District Midnapore, in the State of West Bengal. On 4th January, 2001, the complainant and
The Management of Advance Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Shri Gurudasmal & Ors. 1970 (1) SCC 633
Kazi Lhendup Dorji Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Ors1994 Supp (2) SCC 116, referred
Supreme Court Bar Association Vs. Union of India & Anr, (1998) 4 SCC 409
State of Rajasthan & Ors. Vs. Union of India & Ors., (1977) 3 SCC 592
S.R. Bommai & Ors. Vs. Union of India & Ors. (1994) 3 SCC 1 relied (Para 10)
Kuldip Nayar & Ors. Vs. Union of India & Ors.. (2006) 7 SCC 1 relied (Para 10)
I.R. Coelho (D) By LRs. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu(2007) 2 SCC 1
Minerva Mills Ltd. & Ors. Vs.Union of India & Ors., 1980) 3 SCC 625
Fertilizer Corporation Kamgar Union (Regd.)
Nilabati Behera Vs. State of Orissa & Ors(1993) 2 SCC 746 referred (Para 11)
L.Chandra Kumar Vs. Union of India & Ors (1997) 3 SCC 261 referred (Para 11)
Vineet Narain & Ors. Vs. Union of India & Anr (1998) 1 SCC 226
Raja Ram Pal Vs. Hon’ble Speaker, Lok Sabha & Ors (2007) 3 SCC 184
Kesavananda Bharati Sripadagalvaru Vs. State of Kerala & Anr. (1973) 4 SCC 225
State of U.P. & Ors. Vs. Jeet S. Bisht & Anr. 2007) 6 SCC 586
Kehar Singh & Anr. Vs. Union of India & Anr., (1989) 1 SCC 204
M. Nagaraj & Ors. Vs. Union of India & Ors (2006) 8 SCC 212
Bandhua Mukti Morcha Vs. Union of India & Ors,1984) 3 SCC 161
Khatri & Ors. (II) Vs. State of Bihar & Ors. (1981) 1 SCC 627
a Khatri & Ors. (IV) Vs. State of Bihar & Ors. (1981) 2 SCC 493
Kharak Singh Vs. State of U.P (1964) 1 SCR 332
Secretary, Minor Irrigation & Rural Engineering Services, U.P. & Ors. Vs. Sahngoo Ram Arya & Anr.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.