SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Manipur) 15

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL
GOLMEI GAIPHULSHILLU KABUI, J.
 
Dr. Salam Kenny Singh, S/o Salam Shyamananda Singh of Thangmeiband Khomdram Selungba Leikai - Appellant 
Versus
The Union of India - Respondent
WP(C) No. 707 of 2022
Decided on : 21-03-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. L. Anand, Sr. Advocate, Mr. S. Biswajit, Sr. Advocate, Mr. K. Roshan, Advocate
For the Respondents: Mr. Kh. Samarjit, DSGI

The denial of financial benefits from the effective date of promotion constitutes discrimination, violating Article 14 of the Constitution.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 226 - Writ petitions for mandamus/certiorari - Petitioners challenged the promotion order dated 26.05.2022, which granted notional promotion without financial benefits until 24.03.2022 - Petitioners argued for financial benefits from the effective date of promotion, i.e., 01.02.2019 - Court found that the respondents had previously granted financial benefits from the effective date of promotion and that the petitioners were similarly situated to other faculty members who received such benefits - The court ruled that the denial of financial benefits constituted discrimination and violated Article 14 of the Constitution. (Paras 1-28)

(B) Time Scale Promotion Rules, 1991 - The court emphasized that the Time Scale Promotion Rules are designed to provide timely promotions based on eligibility and service duration, and that notional promotions without financial benefits were unprecedented and unjust. (Paras 10-20)

(C) Equality before law - The court reiterated that employees under the same employer must be treated equally and that arbitrary distinctions in promotion and financial benefits are impermissible. (Paras 27-28)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners, faculty members at the Regional Institute of Medical Sciences, challenged the promotion order that granted them notional promotions without financial benefits from the effective date of promotion. They argued that they were entitled to financial benefits from 01.02.2019, the date of their promotion.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the respondents had previously granted financial benefits from the effective date of promotion and that the petitioners were entitled to similar treatment.

Issues: The main issues were whether the petitioners were entitled to financial benefits from the effective date of promotion and whether the denial of such benefits constituted discrimination.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the denial of financial benefits from the effective date of promotion was discriminatory and violated the principle of equality under Article 14 of the Constitution.

Result: Writ petitions allowed; the promotion order was modified to grant financial benefits from 01.02.2019.

JUDGMENT :

GOLMEI GAIPHULSHILLU KABUI, J.

[1] Heard Mr. L. Anand, learned Sr. counsel appearing for the petitioners in WP(C) No. 605 of 2022 & WP(C) No. 606 of 2022; Mr. S. Biswajit, learned Sr. counsel appearing for the petitioner in WP(C) No. 707 of 2022; Mr. K. Roshan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner in WP(C) No. 621 of 2022 and Mr. Kh. Samarjit, learned DSGI assisted by Mr. Nongdamba, learned counsel appearing for the respondents.

[2] These writ petitions were filed by the petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying inter – alia for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus/certiorari or any other appropriate order (s) –

In WP(C) No. 707 of 2022 the petitioner is praying:

(i) to admit the Writ Petition, call for the records of the case and issue rule nisi calling upon the Respondents to show cause as to why the prayers prayed for by the Petitioner should not be granted. And, after hearing them your Lordships may make the rule absolute;

(ii) to issue a writ in the nature of mandamus/certiorari or any other appropriate writ for quashing the portion i.e. “as notional date of promotion without any financial benefits. Financial benefits be given after 24th March, 2022 in all the promoted faculty members” occurred in the promotion order No. B/3343/2020-RIMS(TSP)/1020 dated 26.05.2022 issued by the Regional Institute of Medical Sciences (RIMS for short) thereby directing the Respondents for suitable modification/rectification in the said promotion order for granting the entitled financial benefits from the date of effective promotion i.e. w.e.f 01.02.2019 in respect of the petitioner in the fact and circumstances of the present case;

(iii) to direct the respondents for granting the entitled arrear to the petitioner by virtue of the promotion Order dated 26.05.2022 within a stipulated timeframe preferable within 2(two) months;

(iv) to pass any other appropriate order(s) or direction(s) that this Hon’ble Court deem fit and proper; and

(v) to award cost of the Petition to the petitioner.

In WP(C) No. 605 of 2022, WP(C) No. 606 of 2022 the petitioners are praying:

(i) to admit the present writ petition;

(ii) to issue rule nisi calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why prayer sought for by the petitioner shall not be granted in the facts and circumstances of the present case;

(iii) to issue a writ in the nature of writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ or order (s) for quashing/setting aside the impugned portion of the order bearing No. B/3343/2020-RIMS (TSP) dated the 26th May, 2022 (Annexure –A/1) issued by the Regional Institute of Medical Sciences, Imphal wherein financial benefits were given only after 24th March, 2022 to the petitioners with a humble prayer for giving a direction to the respondents to provide financial benefits from the effective date of promotion i.e. 1.1.2019 applicable to the petitioners.

(iv) to set aside the impugned portion of pay structure in the order dated 26.05.2022 (Annexure A/1) and correct the pay anomaly by directing the respondents to give corresponding higher pay matrix under 7th CPC from the date of its implementation in the facts and circumstances of the present case;

(v) to direct the respondents to release the aforementioned financial benefits including arrears in favour of the petitioners within a period of 2 months.

(vi) To direct the respondents for giving financial benefits by treating the petitioners equally with other similarly situated faculty members (Doctors) who were previously extended promotions under Time Scale Promotion at Regional Institute of Medical Sciences, Imphal;

(vii) Pass any order (s) which the Hon’ble Court may deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of this case and in the interest of justice.

In WP(C) No. 621 of 2022 the petitioners are praying:

(i) to admit the present writ petition;

(ii) to issue rule nisi calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why prayer sought for by the petitioner shall not be gran

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top