SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Manipur) 12

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL
A. Guneshwar Sharma, J.
The State of Manipur represented by the Chief Secretary (Home) and ors. - Petitioners
Versus
Mohammad Hussain @ Thoiba and ors. - Respondents
Cril. Revision Petition No. 10 of 2021
Decided On : 03-06-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. M. Devananda Addl. AG (Spl.PP) & Ms. N. Jotsna, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Mr. HS. Paonam, Sr. Adv. assisted by Ms. Lekhakumari, Adv; Mr. L. Shashibhusan, Sr. Adv. assisted by Ms. Kangungailui Kamei, Adv; Mr. H. Nabachandra, Adv.; Mr. S. Jhaljit, Adv.

In narcotic drug cases, subsequent procedural non-compliance and shifting of occurrence location do not preclude ongoing trials; mandatory provisions of NDPS Act must be adhered to but are contextually evaluated during trial proceedings.

Headnote:(A) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Sections 177, 178, 227, 228 and Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 468 - Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 22(c), 29, 60(3), 41, 42, 43, 50 and 52A - Revision petition against the discharge order dated 20.01.2021 in a narcotic drug case, where the trial court found violations of mandatory provisions for search and seizure - The special judge held shifting of the place of occurrence invalid and discharged the accused due to non-compliance of legal provisions. (Paras 8-10)

(B) The High Court found that the discharge was erroneous, establishing that elements under Sections 22(c), 29, 60(3) ND&PS Act and Section 468 IPC were made out against the respondents - The Court reiterated that absence of prior information does not negate seizure in a public place and that the vehicle's seizure counts as ongoing conduct for jurisdiction. (Paras 28-30)

(C) The mandatory nature of Sections 41, 42, and 50 was debated, indicating their prerequisites must be satisfied for validity in trial - Court established grounds for not applying these sections due to nature of chance recovery and failure to comply with procedural requirements should be evaluated during the trial. (Paras 26-27)

(D)

Result: Impugned discharge order set aside, charges to be framed and trial to proceed. (Paras 34)

Table of Content
1. details on the drug seizure and arrests. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
2. grounds for discharge of the accused. (Para 8)
3. prosecution's arguments on jurisdiction. (Para 10 , 14)
4. analysis of trial court's errors. (Para 11 , 12)
5. ingredients of offences established. (Para 30 , 31 , 32)

JUDGMENT :

A. Guneshwar Sharma, J.

1. Heard Mr. M. Devananda, learned Addl. A.G. assisted by Ms. Jyotsana, learned counsel for the petitioners/State; Mr. HS. Paonam, learned senior counsel assisted by Ms. Lekhakumari, Advocate; Mr. L. Shashibhushan, learned senior counsel assisted by Ms. Kangungailui Kamei, Advocate; Mr. S. Jhalajit, learned counsel; and Mr. H. Nabakumar, learned counsel for the respondents/accused persons.

2. Vide order dated 29.04.2024 in SLP(Crl.) No. 1536 of 2024 filed by the respondent/accused No.2 herein, the Hon’ble Supreme Court desired this Court to decide the revision petition filed by the State against the discharge order as expeditiously as possible and in any case, by the end of May, 2024. Accordingly, this case was listed on 30.05.2024 for pronouncement of judgment. However, due to sudden flash flood in Manipur, there were no court sittings on 30 & 31 May, 2024 and the case is again listed on 03.06.2024, the next working day available, for pronouncement of judgment.

3. The present Revision Petition has been filed under Section 397 CrPC read with Section 36 -B of the ND&PS Act, against the discharge order dated 20.01.2021 passed by the learned Special Judge (ND&PS) Thoubal in Spl. T. Case No. 12 of 2020 in connection with FIR No. 94(8) 2019 TBL Police Station under Sections 22 (c)/29/60(3) ND&PS Act added Section 468 IPC and in the ex-parte interim prayed U/S 482 of the CrPC read with Section 36 -B of the ND&PS Act for issuing a warrant directing the accused be arrested by any Sub-ordinate Court and lodge them to prison pending the disposal of the above referred revision petition. The respondent Nos. 1 to 9 are accused Nos. 1 to 9 before the court below. The point for determination in the present case is whether the ingredients for the offences punishable under Sections 22 (c)/29/60(3) ND&PS Act and Section 468 IPC are made out against the accused persons or not.

4. The brief facts of the case are that on 24.08.2019 at about 1:10 am, the Thoubal District Police with the assistance of the members of Phoudel Keirambi Youths Club, Phoudel Keirambi intercepted one Tata Di vehicle bearing Regd. No. MN06LA-2847 at IVR (Inter Village Road) of Phoudel Keirambi Mathak Leikai under the jurisdiction of Yairipok PS and the driver was identified as Mohammad Hussain (accused No. 1) and some suspected illegal items were recovered from the said vehicle, around 40,000 (forty thousand) Nos. of suspected WY tablets. The accused No. 1 was arrested by observing all the formalities. From the disclosure of the accused No. 1, one international drug smuggler, namely Mr. Kyaw Kyaw Naing @ Abdul Rahim (accused No. 2) was arrested from Imphal International Airport, Tulihal and recovered from him Indian Currency Rs. 60,000/- in cash, 15 Nos. of 100 denomination US Dollars, one 1000 Kyat, one 5000 kyat, one 100 kyat, one 20 kyat, one 20 taka, one passport being No. SMB110ED with Burma SIM card and one Samsung Duos being No. 6909503887, two pint out e-ticket, one boarding pass issued in the name of Niang Kyaw Yaw being Flight No. 6E 939, one Indian E-VISA being ID No. 1002v0851519.

5. Again, from the disclosure of accused No. 1, one person namely Md. Ayub Khan (accused No. 3) was arrested from Yairipok Lamkhai on 24.08.2019 at about 1:40 pm and seized one Maruti 800 being Regd. No. DL2CAF-0821 and two mobile handsets, one Nokia being Mobile No. 9874512487 and one Redmi mobile phone handset being No. 9366342176. Further, from the disclosure of accused No. 1, arrested one Md. Abdul Rajaque (accused No. 4) from Yairipok Lamkhai on 24.08.2019 at around 2:15 pm as he was also accomplice with accused No. 1 in the transport of narcotic substance. As s

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top