SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

K.SREEDHARAN, S.S.KANG, K.K.BHATIA
Parasrampuria Synthetics Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Customs, New Delhi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
V. Lakshmikumaran, A. Madhav Rao, M.P. Devnath,R.S. Sanglia

ORDER

Per Justice K. Shreedharan :

These appeals have come up before this larger Bench on a reference made by a Bench of two Members. Appellants imported drawings, designs, plans, etc. from M/s Zimmer AG, Germany, under an agreement for transfer of technology for the purpose of setting up a plant to manufacture polyester, polyester filament yarn and Polyester staple fibre. Commissioner of Customs, New Delhi, found the goods as classifiable under Customs Tariff Heading 4911.99 "other printed matters not elsewhere specified or included under Chapter 49. "in this view, the goods imported were valued at DM 32,66, 900.00 equivalent to Rs. 7,50,61,438.00 and imposed duty thereon. The Commissioner took the view that the goods are liable to be confiscated, but they are not available for confiscation in the case. Consequently, he imposed a penalty amounting to Rs. 5 lakhs each on three of the Directors of the Company. This action of the department is under challenge in these appeals.

2. Case put forth by the Company is that the imported materials are printed books which are to be classified under Heading 49.01 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 as they are books containing technical knowledge. T

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top