SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

P.K.DESAI
Commissioner of Central Excise, Ahmedabad – Appellant
Versus
Kashiram Textile Mills (P. ) Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Krishnamurthy,G.M. Chandnani

ORDER

Per P.K. Desai :Today the matter was listed for admission. However, considering the issue involved, the entire appeal is taken up for hearing.

2. This appeal by the Department is directed against the Order-in-Appeal No.240/95 (93-AHD)CE/Collr./95 dt. 14.8.95, setting aside the Order-in-Original No.42/93 dt. 28.4.93 of the Assistant Collector of Central Excise, Ahmedabad.

3. The respondents filed a refund claim for Rs. 45,000/- on 8.10.91, for the amount paid during the period 23.1.90 to 12.3.90. The Show Cause Notice was issued on 25.3.92 for adjudicating upon the same refund claim. However, the Assistant Collector sanctioned the refund claim against the said decision, the department went in appeal before the Collector (Appeals), pleading that the issue of unjust enrichment had not been properly considered by the Assistant Collector. While dismissing the appeal of the Department, however the Collector (Appeals) held that though the order of the Assistant Collector was liable to be set aside on the issue of unjust enrichment and refund sanctioned was not proper, rejected the appeal of the Department holding that for filing an appeal vide Section 35-E of the Central Excise & Salt

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top