M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
Syed Jalal – Appellant
Versus
Modroom Sri Ram Chabdra Murthy – Respondent
M. Satyanarayana Murthy, J.—This revision petition, under Sub-Section 9 of Section 83 of the Wakf Act, 1995 (for short, the Act), is filed challenging the Order dated 08.03.2016 in I.A. No.458 of 2015 in O.S. No.59 of2013 passed by the Andhra Pradesh State Wakf Tribunal at Hyderabad, (for short, the Tribunal), whereby the application filed under Rule 11 of Order VII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, ‘C.P.C.’) read with Section 87 of the Act was allowed rejecting the plaint filed before it on the ground that the plaint does not disclose cause of action for the suit.
2. The parties hereinafter be referred to as arrayed in the suit before the Tribunal, for convenience of reference.
3. The defendants 1 to 5 filed a petition in I.A. No.458 of 2015 before the Tribunal under Rule 11 of Order VII of C.P.C. read with Section 87 of the Act alleging that the plaintiff filed suit in O.S. No.59 of 2013 for cancellation of sale deed dated 12.01.2013 conveying the property in Sy.No.113 admeasuring Ac.4.72 cents situated at Pernamitta Village, Santhanuthalapadu Mandal, Prakasam District, Andhra Pradesh, without any basis, only to harass them. The said suit is filed as if th
Molugu Ram Reddy and others v. Molugu Vittal Reddy and others
Saleem Bhai and others v. State of Maharashtra and others
Tamil Nadu Wakf Board v. Hathija Ammal (Dead) by Legal Representatives
Syed Shah Mohamood Hussaini and another v. Mohammed Rafiuddin Khan and others
Salam Khan v. Tamil Nadu Wakf Board
T. Arivandandam versus T. v. Satyapal and another
A.B.C. Laminart Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. v. A.P. Agencies
K.N. Reddy v. Defence Personnel Co-op Housing Building Society Ltd., Secunderabad
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.